Can h(x)=(cos x)^x be written as a composition of two functions f and

PeterPumpkin
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Can h(x)=(cos x)^x be written as a composition of two functions f and g where f(x)=x^n and g(x)=cosx ? where h=fog

REASON FOR ASKING: I am wondering this in connect with a differentiation I was having trouble with (but can now solve thanks to this forum). I mistakenly thought that I could apply the chain rule for composition of functions. Seems it doesn't apply. (https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=2796762#post2796762)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


You need to be careful with notation. In your example
h(x)=f\circ g(x)=(\cos(x))^n
where you have a different variable in the exponent. So all rules you know are valid without exception, but you have to get the notation right.

You could also try
f(x)=a^x or f(x,n)=x^n
but you'll notice that at some point the expression won't match what you have in your rules.
 


It can't, because in h(x) the exponent is x, the variable, while in f(x) the exponent is a constant. This makes an important difference when you are differentiating because the standard "power law" only applies when the exponent is constant.
 


Gib Z said:
It can't, because in h(x) the exponent is x, the variable, while in f(x) the exponent is a constant. This makes an important difference when you are differentiating because the standard "power law" only applies when the exponent is constant.
Specifically, the derivative of xa, with a constant, is axa-1 while the derivative of ax is (ln(a))ax.
 


Thanks. I can see my mistake --- there's no way to define f(x) to satisfy the requirements.
 


There is. Remember that f(x) = e^{\ln f(x)}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top