Can Helium-Filled Surgical Hose Stand Vertically?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Photon713
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helium
AI Thread Summary
Filling a 4-5 foot piece of surgical hose with helium is unlikely to result in it standing vertically due to the thick walls of the hose, which may offset the buoyancy of the helium. To determine if it would float or stand, one can calculate the weight of the hose filled with helium compared to the weight of the same volume of air. If the hose weighs less than the helium-filled volume, it will float; if it weighs slightly more, it may stand upright; if it weighs considerably more, it will remain on the ground. The discussion highlights that unlike a balloon, which can regulate its position with a string, the hose lacks this feature, making it less likely to achieve a stable vertical position.
Photon713
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
If I filled a 4-5 foot piece of surgical hose with helium, would it stand vertically? How long would it remain assuming both ends were sealed? Would some other flexible material work better? A balloon on a string would not work for my purpose. Thank You
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I doubt it, since surgical hose has a rather thick wall. The weight of the hose would probably offset the buoyancy of the helium.
 
Well, you can just do the maths and discover by yourself. You just need to know how much the hose weights, and its volume(total and internal, although just internal will do). Then just calculate how much the hose filled with helium weights, and how much the same volume or air weights. If the hose weights less, it'll float, if it weights just slightly more it's very likely stand up, if it weights considerably more it'll just remain on the ground.
 
Munfred said:
if it weights just slightly more

if it weights considerably more

Where is the border between slightly and considerably?
 
Borek said:
Where is the border between slightly and considerably?
Well now that's quite a good question, but 'slightly' would be like when you have your helium balloon with the string on it and it floats with some string on the ground. in this case the balloon + string weights is just slightly more than the same volume in air. If it simply can't get off the ground then it weights considerably more. :rolleyes:
 
With the balloon, the string acts as a regulator. The balloon rises until it's weight plus the amount of string not resting on the ground equals the weight of air being displaced.

If the balloon rises higher, more string weight is added and it sinks back. If it sinks too low, it has less weight from the string and will rise back up.

The tubing does not have such a regulator, so that is a problem. I.e., it will either float to the ceiling, or fall over. You can't get it exactly right.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top