Can Humans Create a 'Super Race' Without Discarding Genetic Disorders?

  • Thread starter Thread starter waht
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dna Mutation
AI Thread Summary
Selecting healthy and intelligent individuals from the gene pool for isolated reproduction raises significant concerns about the persistence of common ailments in future generations. Even with maintained genetic diversity, it is likely that offspring would still develop the same health issues prevalent in the general population. The concept of the "founder effect" illustrates that isolated groups can exhibit specialized traits, often unfavorable, due to limited genetic variation. This approach could lead to genetic disequilibrium, where low diversity increases vulnerability to diseases, potentially threatening the entire population. Historical examples, such as the Navajo people, demonstrate how isolation can result in higher rates of specific health issues like near-sightedness and age-related deafness. The subjective nature of defining traits like 'smart' further complicates the feasibility of creating a so-called "super race." Overall, the idea is fraught with risks and ethical considerations.
waht
Messages
1,499
Reaction score
4
If you were to select healthy and smart people from our gene pool (in hopes of creating better humans), and let them reproduce in isolation without further intervention, would the generations of offspring down the line still develop the same ailments that the general population develops? Assuming that the genetic diversity is kept the same. My hunch of course is yes. If so then it is not possible to create the "super race" without constantly discarding individuals with genetic disorders.
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
There is something called the "founder effect" in gene pools. Whenever a few humans colonize an isolated area, their descendants often show a lot of specialized - often not too favorable - traits. Overall, this is not a great idea for this and other reasons.
One being that your idea of what 'smart' means and my idea could be radically different.

The big one being that you would create optimal genetic disequilbrium - meaning genetic diversity would be low; one one new disease, for example, could kill everybody off.

Founder Example: Navajos from the Chinle area have very high rates of near-sightedness and age-related deafness. The Navajo people were isolated and did not intermarry with other peoples very much. From the 1300's up until 1900's.
 
Last edited:
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top