Can I Calculate the Variance of Forces in Non-Ideal Plane Balancing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Weirdzzl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane
AI Thread Summary
To determine the variance of forces exerted by three supports on a flat object, calculating the center of mass and comparing it to the axis of effort formed by the supports is essential. The center of mass should align with the axis of effort to maintain balance; any displacement indicates a potential tilt. The forces can be considered ideal if they are closely equal, while greater differences suggest instability. The analysis involves applying downward force at the center of mass and upward force along the axis of effort to assess balance. This approach helps in understanding how variations in support forces affect the stability of the object.
Weirdzzl
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi all, suppose that i have three forces exerting to support a flat piece of uniform object.(Imagine a 3 cylinders supporting an object in a triangular way. In ideal situation, all 3 forces must exert the same amount of force so that the object will not be tilted in any side. But since its non ideal, the 3 forces may vary by a little. How can i come up with a formula that calculates the variance of 3 forces.
For e.g 4.9, 4.8, 4.8 is quite an ideal situation while 4.9,5.0,5.1 is not since it will be abit lopsided. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming this is a ridgid plane...

This sounds to me like you would want to calulate the center of mass of the plane and compare that location to the center of effort of the three supports (and since there are three, I think the correct view would be to see if this would actually be a "line" or axis of effort).

Then apply the down vector at the center of mass and the up vector through the axis of effort, and use the displacement between them (distance from the point to the line). The line axis of effort is going to rest on two of the three supports, and if the center of mass of the plane is on one side of that line, the plane rests, but if it is on the other side (the side without the third support under it), then it falls.

Something like that?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top