Can I catch up on physics as a chemistry grad student?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HAYAO
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A Japanese graduate student in Chemistry is seeking advice on how to effectively study physics, particularly quantum physics, to enhance their research in photochemistry. They feel that their limited understanding of physics is hindering their potential as they enter a PhD program. The discussion emphasizes the importance of consulting with a professor for guidance on a tailored study plan. It suggests focusing on acquiring a general awareness of related subjects rather than in-depth knowledge of all areas. For instance, gaining a basic understanding of spectroscopy and quantum mechanics relevant to photochemistry is recommended, but in a way that does not consume excessive time. The key takeaway is to prioritize learning that directly supports their research while maintaining a balance with their chemistry studies.
HAYAO
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
379
Reaction score
238
I am currently a Japanese graduate student in Chemistry department in a Japanese college.

I have been studying photochemistry, and I have come to realize that my lack of understanding for physics is making me unable to draw out my full potential in my ability to do good research. However, I am already a graduate student. To tell a little more, I am actually entering the PhD. course starting October (I am skipping half a grade of masters degree for this) and I believe I am too late to start studying physics (mainly quantum physics). At the same time, I feel the need to study the fundamental aspect and the meaning behind all these concepts that I would usually happen to "pretend that I know".

My question is, is there an effective way to study physics in any way possible (taking class, study alone, start things over, etc.)? Or should I just forget and continue on with my chemistry career without having any background in physics, given the situation I am in?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics is really logical subject and if u do want to pretand that you know about it then just do have confidance that can fack that becus it require time to know any subject whether it is your chemistry or physics...
 
I am guessing that in a PhD program you have a professor who can advise you. Maybe you can discuss this with that professor and figure out what the best plan of study is.

There is more scientific knowledge than anybody can learn. Even the very intelligent, as you must be to get into a PhD program, cannot learn everything. So the thing to do is, pick what will help you the most. Learn that. The problem with making this decision is, you don't know in advance what will be the most use. So you have to do some guessing. And your prof can help.

Once you get to a graduate level the thing to do is probably to get a general awareness of a lot of closely related subjects. But not to spend 100s of hours going through the texts except for your specific area. That way you can have a good chance to spot places where you can use work from related subjects. When one of these opportunities comes up you can go study that area more carefully.

So, for example, photochemistry probably has spectroscopy as an important subject. You should probably study some of the background material for spectroscopy. But you probably should not spend months doing it unless that is your specific area of work. You probably want a survey that you can read in a few days so you know the basic types and operation of the most common kinds of spectroscopes. Then you could be ready to use the right kind of spectroscope when you do work that needs one.

For another example, photochemistry depends on the energy levels of atoms and molecules. Maybe you should study the quantum mechanics that let's us estimate these values. But how much time you spend on this depends on how useful it will be. There is a huge body of work on this topic. Trying to learn it all will use up a huge amount of time, and maybe keep you from getting forward with your own career. Maybe what you want is a survey that takes 2 or 3 days to read, and gives you the general outline of the most important methods used these days. That way you will be ready if you need to do some work of this kind.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top