I Can I Use a Natural Log Function for Least Square Fitting?

JoJoQuinoa
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm trying to follow Wolfram to do a least square fitting. There are multiple summations in the two equations to find the coefficients. Are the i's the same in this case?

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
JoJoQuinoa said:
Hello,

I'm trying to follow Wolfram to do a least square fitting. There are multiple summations in the two equations to find the coefficients. Are the i's the same in this case?

Thanks!
In both equations, i is the index of all of the summations. These summations run for i = 1, 2, 3, and so on, up to n. Here n is the number of points you're fitting to the log curve.
 
  • Like
Likes JoJoQuinoa
@Mark44

Sorry I just looked at it and got confused again. So for coefficient b, can I write the numerator as
##\Sigma_{i=1}^n (n*y_i*ln(x_i)-y_i*ln(x_i))##.
 
Last edited:
JoJoQuinoa said:
@Mark44

Sorry I just looked at it and got confused again. So for coefficient b, can I write the numerator as
##\Sigma_{i=1}^n (n*y_i*ln(x_i)-y_i*ln(x_i))##.
No. The formula shown in the Wolfram page for the numerator of b is
$$n\sum_{i =1}(y_i\ln(x_i)) - (\sum_{i = 1}y_i)(\sum_{i = 1}\ln(x_i)$$
You can't simplify things as you have done. You need to calculate all three summations. Once you have these numbers, multiply the first summation by n, multiply the second and third summations together, and then subtract as shown.
 
Just plot y vs x, with x plotted on a log scale (by your graphics package). The result should be a straight line, and the graphics package should automatically determine the best least squares fit equation to the data.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top