Can I use method of sections anywhere?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NoobeAtPhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the applicability of the method of sections for finding the tension in a rope. It is clarified that using a free body diagram (FBD) is more appropriate for this problem rather than the method of sections. The importance of applying Newton's laws in the context of static equilibrium is emphasized. A FBD should ideally cut through the rope to simplify the analysis. Overall, the method of sections is not necessary for solving this particular problem.
NoobeAtPhysics
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the tension in the rope

t8mbrd.png


Homework Equations



F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



I was wondering whether I could use method of sections in this problem to divide the two systems so that I could find the tension in the rope.

I have a strong feeling that I won't be able to.. why can't I?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need the method of sections. You just need to draw a FBD for the bar BD and then write the equations of static equilibrium.
 
NoobeAtPhysics said:

Homework Statement



Find the tension in the rope

t8mbrd.png


Homework Equations



F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



I was wondering whether I could use method of sections in this problem to divide the two systems so that I could find the tension in the rope.

I have a strong feeling that I won't be able to.. why can't I?
What you are calling "method of sections" is more generally referred to as "free body diagram(FBD)". You can take a FBD anywhere, but is is simplest to take one that cuts throught the rope, then apply Newton's laws for the equilibrium case (a = ??) .
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top