Can Inflation Theory Explain the Curious Behavior of Gravity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wimms
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores a speculative theory linking inflation to gravity, suggesting that as the universe expands, fundamental particles and empty space also inflate. This inflation could cause two bodies to collide if the space between them does not inflate as quickly, leading to a higher density of matter compared to empty space. The theory posits that while bodies do not perceive inflation locally, they may experience attraction when in proximity, potentially even repulsion from the surrounding empty space. The conversation hints at the possibility of developing a new cosmological framework based on this idea, while acknowledging the complexity of understanding gravity from within our reference point. Overall, the theory presents a humorous yet thought-provoking take on the nature of gravity and its relationship with cosmic inflation.
wimms
Messages
489
Reaction score
0
Useless crackpot obviously, but imo in a way funny twist.

Universe expands. ok, why not fundamental particles then?
Imagine that Earth inflates. You inflate, your atoms inflate. Empty space inflates. Two bodies in proximity would collide due to inflation, if empty space between them does not inflate as fast as bodies. Density of bodies is always bigger than of empty space, so they inflate faster. In close proximity this means unavoidable approach of bodies. Over vast distances, sheer amount of empty space between would turn approach into departure. Departure velocity proportional to distance.

Body itself would not perceive inflation, all local references infate too. What it will perceive is attraction only when close enough. Maybe even repulsion from empty space towards other body. Inflation rate related to obviously some fancy ratio of Planck and lightspeed.

Looks like could build quite some cosmology on that...

please don't kill
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I change my mind there could be a million viable hypothesis on gravity not just a few hundred. So gravity could be something that we can't understand because we are within the reference point that creates it?
 

Thread 'Why can't Solar panels be hemispherical, or a curved strip type?'

comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Why doesn't cosmic inflation violate conservation of energy?
Replies
3
Views
3K
I Some questions about Cosmic Inflation
Replies
4
Views
4K
I Universal Gravity without Shell Theorem
Replies
13
Views
2K
Could Gravity Be More About Electromagnetic Forces Than We Think?
Replies
6
Views
3K
Spaghettification and gravity in theory of relativity?
Replies
1
Views
2K
What does a temporally infinite universe imply?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Inflation, Mach's Principle & the Early Universe
Replies
7
Views
3K
A "The 7 Strangest Coincidences in the Laws of Nature" (S. Hossenfelder)
2
Replies
62
Views
9K
I General Relativity as a Theory of Gravity Explained
Replies
13
Views
2K
My Theory of Gravity: Mass Causes Time Dilation & Attraction
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top