Can intellectual activity protect against Alzheimer's disease?

  • Thread starter Thread starter flippy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between intelligence and Alzheimer's disease, with participants noting that Alzheimer's does not discriminate based on IQ. Personal experiences in care homes reveal a diverse range of individuals affected by the disease, from highly educated professionals to those with lower intellectual capabilities. The conversation highlights that factors such as genetics and mental stimulation may play a more significant role in the development of Alzheimer's than intelligence itself. The importance of maintaining an active brain through intellectual engagement is emphasized as potentially protective against the disease. Additionally, the demographic composition of care facilities is discussed, with observations about socioeconomic factors influencing the prevalence of Alzheimer's among different racial groups. Overall, the consensus suggests that intelligence is not a determining factor in the onset of Alzheimer's, and further research is encouraged to explore these dynamics.
flippy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have looked for information on this and haven't found anything substantial.
Does Alzhemiers generally affect people with higher IQs? What abt types of intelligences? I don't think intellegence types are genetic but I knew Alzheimer's is. It would be interesting to see a parallel that supports this.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Although i can't come up with figures.
I've got quite a lot of (to bad) experience with alzheimer.
Spending some years visiting you grandmother in a home does show that alzheimer doesn't discriminate in intelligence.

The people i saw suffering from alzheimer's are as diverse as Holland is.
The only thing i saw was that there were in general more white people in the home.
This however is te be explained by the fact that it is a private home, and non-whites (again in general) have nu recources to pay it (and they tend to take more care of their family where as white people shove them in home whenever money allows)

In my granny's home people varied from professors to people who barely had the intelect to clean latrines, and virtually all professions in between.

So i'd tend to think alzheimer isn't Iq bound.
But i'd love to see prove for it should anyone have it, I've only had one home for comparison and that makes my statement not to accurate.
 
One factor among others like genetics, is how much mental stimulation you get. Intelligence really isn't a factor, but a lot of people retire, fish and chill and watch TV all day. Maybe do a crossword puzzle, play along to Jeopardy or write some books.

This is just one thing though, there's lots of variables. It is sad to have a loved one with Alzheimers.
 
This belongs in the Biology forum *moves*

Read the following http://www.alz.org/Research/Theories.asp for an overview of theories on the process of Alzheimer development. Alzheimer is a disease with the hallmark sign of amyloid plaque aggregates. These plaques damage the brain. The brain is a dynamic organ and can re-route itself. Keeping the brain active probably aids in keeping an healthy mind.

Flippy, why do you think that people with a higher intelligence are at increased risk of Alzheimers?
 
flippy said:
Does Alzhemiers generally affect people with higher IQs?
It seems that the lifetime intellectual activity could have a certain protective function on the development of Alzheimer's disease.
This is an interesting work concerning your question:
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/98/6/3440.pdf
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top