Can ionizing radiation split water?

AI Thread Summary
Ionizing radiation can indeed split water into hydrogen and oxygen through a process called radiolysis, which generates radicals that can recombine unless collected. The efficiency of radiolysis compared to electrolysis is debated, with concerns about the need for regulatory oversight when using radioactive sources. High-energy radiation, like X-rays, poses safety risks and may not be more effective than conventional methods for water splitting. The discussion also touches on the potential of using magnetic fields to separate ions, though this would not constitute true separation. Overall, while radiolysis offers an alternative method for hydrogen production, practical and safety considerations limit its application.
iwant2beoz
Messages
96
Reaction score
1
I was just wondering if ionizing radiation can split water into hydrogen and oxygen? Thanks in advance :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Cool thank you for the link:) do you know if it is more or less efficient then using the electric method?
 
iwant2beoz said:
Cool thank you for the link:) do you know if it is more or less efficient then using the electric method?
Radiolysis produces a variety of radicals, and the radicals will react with other species (e.g., cations) in the water. Once a water molecule splits into H + OH, it will try to recombine. One would need some way to collect H and O from the water in order to mitigate the recombination.

For operating nuclear reactors, radiolysis in important with respect to the electochemical potential of the water - as are the soluble gases and impurities. Corrosion and corrosion products get activated in a neutron field.
 
Ok so let's say one where to use a standard electrolysis and expose it to a high energy radiation source, would that help separate the ions? And would it help reduce the electrical energy needed? I have also thought about using ultrasound to help supply the energy needed but i don't know if it will work.
 
iwant2beoz said:
Cool thank you for the link:) do you know if it is more or less efficient then using the electric method?

Well, for one thing, you don't need a license to split water with electricity. If you start handling radioactive sources, all sorts of official regulatory and security bodies get concerned.
 
SteamKing said:
Well, for one thing, you don't need a license to split water with electricity. If you start handling radioactive sources, all sorts of official regulatory and security bodies get concerned.

Thats true, so can i use some kind of high energy EM radiation? Say Xrays, if i recall correctly old crt screens can be modified to emit Xrays and be set up to focus them at a single point.
 
Any type of high-energy radiation like X-rays is dangerous. That's why X-ray labs and the personnel who work in them are shielded from exposure to X-rays. Again, using these techniques cause concern from regulatory and security agencies. It's not something to be fooling around with casually.
 
Yes steamking i know that, and i won't be playing with radiation anytime soon. I have no interest in getting anyone hurt or myself. But my question still stands, Would Xrays used in conjunction with electricity work to split water more effectively then conventional methods?
 
  • #10
I doubt it, otherwise you would see all kinds of 'X-ray oxygen' all over town. It takes more than juking with second hand CRTs to create reliable, high-energy X-ray sources, plus the cost of the electricity to run them, which could be used directly to hydrolyze water instead of being fed into an X-ray machine first.
 
  • #11
iwant2beoz said:
Yes steamking i know that, and i won't be playing with radiation anytime soon. I have no interest in getting anyone hurt or myself. But my question still stands, Would Xrays used in conjunction with electricity work to split water more effectively then conventional methods?

If you're interested, here is a paper on the efficiency of electrolysis of water to produce hydrogen and several methods to increase the efficiency.

http://www.electrochemsci.org/papers/vol7/7043314.pdf
 
  • #12
Thank you i will read it soon
 
  • #13
Drakkith said:
If you're interested, here is a paper on the efficiency of electrolysis of water to produce hydrogen and several methods to increase the efficiency.

http://www.electrochemsci.org/papers/vol7/7043314.pdf
Radiolysis is absent in the cited paper, so there is an opportunity to review applications of radiolysis to electrolytic separation of hydrogen from H20. Radiolysis does provide energy (via ionization) to break the water molecule, and the ionziation of the water will improve the conductivity.

One aspect of radioactive sources is that they cannot be turned off (decay is an ongoing process), and shielding must be used if humans (or other life forms) are in the vicinity of the radiation field.
 
  • #14
Forgive me if this seems to be a silly question I'm not a physicist, I'm a bio major. Will either of the products (H/O2) have a chance of being radioactive?
 
  • #15
iwant2beoz said:
Forgive me if this seems to be a silly question I'm not a physicist, I'm a bio major. Will either of the products (H/O2) have a chance of being radioactive?
The water would not be radioactive if the source emits beta (electrons) and gamma rays. They interact with the atomic electrons through ionization.

Matter becomes radioactive when the nucleus is changed from a stable isotope/nuclide to an unstable isotope, usually by absorption of a neutron, or interaction with a high energy particle, e.g., proton, or other nuclear (subatomic) particle. The latter implies a spallation reaction, but they require high energy.

In nuclear reactors which use the fission process, the neutron field is established through the fission process in which 2 or 3 neutrons are emitted from the fission, along with fission products. Otherwise, some initial neutrons are produced from (α, n) reactions, or (γ, n) reactions, or possibly through spontaenous fission reactions. Spontaneous fission is a decay mode of some transuranic nuclides.

Ideally, radiolysis is acheived without a neutron field, but rather using gamma and beta particles.
 
  • #16
would it be possible to use a magnetic field to separate the H and O ions? I know that plasma can be guided with magnets? also what is the difference between beta particles and the electrons coming from an electron "gun" as found in a crt? (steamking I know you want to fuss but relax i don't intend to actually build anything with a crt)
 
  • #17
iwant2beoz said:
would it be possible to use a magnetic field to separate the H and O ions? I know that plasma can be guided with magnets?
If the water is moving and there is a magnetic field crossing the flow then the + and - ions will be pushed the opposite way withing the flow (MHD effect, google it). But: this is not a separation.

iwant2beoz said:
also what is the difference between beta particles and the electrons coming from an electron "gun" as found in a crt? (steamking I know you want to fuss but relax i don't intend to actually build anything with a crt)
There are just practical differences. Energy spectrum, randomness, amount, direction, focus, usage.
 
Back
Top