Can Killer Whales Jump 15 Feet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter perpetual-burn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jump
AI Thread Summary
Killer whales can potentially jump 15 feet, as calculations suggest they can reach a maximum height of approximately 30 feet when jumping at a 45-degree angle. The whale's top speed of 13.5 m/s contributes to its ability to achieve this height. Using physics formulas, the maximum range calculated is around 18.58 meters, supporting the possibility of the jump. While the calculations may not be thoroughly verified, the conclusion remains that the jump is feasible. The discussion invites further validation or disagreement from others.
perpetual-burn
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Well, I'm pretty sure this is impossible. But anyone have this proven. I need to try n prove this for my class. Any help is apperaciated. By the way, killer whales top speed is 13.5 m/s, he jumps out of the water at abotu a 45 degree andgle and the pier he jumps is 15 feet high and 10 feet long.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if we are just concerned with whether it is possible or not, then I would have to say that it is indeed possible, likely or not is a diferenmt story.

using the formulas:
Maximum range = (Vi^2/g)*sin(2*angle) gives us the max range of the whale, I get 18.58 meters.

Y position = tan(angle)X - (g*vi)/((2(Vi*sin(angle)))^2) gives us the height (Y) at a given position X, well if we assume the whale time the jump perfectly so that the maximum height will occur at the center of the pier, then that mean that the max height would be at about 9.29 meters from where the whale originally jumps, with a height of 9.04 meter (about 30 feet). and then will land another 9.29 meters from the center of pier.

I didnt spen too much time checking all my calculations and the numbers I used in them, but I am fairly confident in my answer of yes, the whale, could make the jump.
 
does anyone want to back me up on this, disagree with me, or will we just assume that I am right?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top