Can leather be used for a Van de Graaff generator's bottom roller?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fischer777
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Leather is being considered for the bottom roller of a Van de Graaff generator due to its high position on the triboelectric scale, with initial tests indicating that the soft, fuzzy side is more effective. The discussion also touches on the charge dynamics, clarifying that using leather on the bottom roller and PVC on the top can allow for either a negative or positive charge on the dome, depending on the design. Participants recommend further research on DIY Van de Graaff construction for additional insights. The importance of the leather's rough side being outward is emphasized for optimal performance. Overall, the choice of materials and their arrangement is crucial for achieving the desired electrical charge.
Fischer777
Messages
89
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone. I am trying to build a Van de Graaff generator for a project of mine (the triboelectric kind), and I have heard that leather is very high on the triboelectric scale, so I plan on using it for the bottom roller. However, I am not sure if this is referring to the smooth, tanned side of the leather, or the 'fuzzy' soft side. My initial tests conclude that it is the soft side, but I want to make sure.

Also, if I use leather on the bottom roller and PVC for the top, will the dome take on a negative charge? I was under the impression that it would, but after doing some research, I'm not sure anymore.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes, rough side out on the leather belt.

You can design it to make the top negative or positively charged.

I suggest searching for "DIY Van de Graaff" for more construction tips.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
7K
Back
Top