Can light cause eddy currents?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether light can induce eddy currents in materials, drawing parallels between the reflection of microwaves in metals and the reflection of light in glass. Participants explore the mechanisms of electromagnetic wave reflection and the conditions under which eddy currents are generated.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the reflection of light could be analogous to the formation of eddy currents in metals, similar to how microwaves reflect off conductive surfaces.
  • Others argue that electromagnetic reflection at conducting surfaces primarily involves the electric field rather than the magnetic field, questioning the validity of equating light reflection with eddy currents.
  • One participant emphasizes the need to review the definition and generation of eddy currents, providing a detailed description of their behavior and effects.
  • Another viewpoint highlights the differences in time and wavelength scales between eddy currents and light photons, suggesting that these differences complicate direct comparisons.
  • Some participants mention that while classical electromagnetic principles can be applied at larger scales, they may not adequately describe phenomena at the atomic level where light interacts with matter.
  • A participant notes that the wavelength of light is shorter than that of RF signals, which may affect the applicability of certain RF concepts to light reflection.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between eddy currents and light reflection, with no consensus reached. Some believe there is a connection, while others strongly contest this idea, asserting that the two processes are fundamentally different.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various sources and concepts, including Lenz's law and the behavior of electromagnetic waves, but the discussion remains unresolved regarding the applicability of eddy currents to light reflection.

iVenky
Messages
212
Reaction score
12
This may sound dumb..

We know metals reflect microwave. One way to look at this is considering an eddy current formed inside the metal that cause the reflected EM Flux.

When glass reflects light, does something similar happen? Can we have eddy currents (or something analogous) with light since that's also an EM wave?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
iVenky said:
We know metals reflect microwave. One way to look at this is considering an eddy current formed inside the metal that cause the reflected EM Flux.
Can you give a reference for this? EM reflection at a conducting surface has to do mainly with the E-Field, not the B-Field, AFAIK...

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-the-physical-proc/

1600213347985.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
berkeman said:
Can you give a reference for this? EM reflection at a conducting surface has to do mainly with the E-Field, not the B-Field, AFAIK...

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-the-physical-proc/

View attachment 269476
I think it's just another way of looking. Even eddy current is an electric current flow that's causing an opposing magnetic flux.
I can take a look, but image something like this. What happens when you place an inductor right above a metal which has 0 resistance (perfect conductor)? eddy currents are formed in the metal that cancels the magnetic flux from the inductor. This is in effect like reflection of flux from inductor at the metal interface.
 
iVenky said:
I think it's just another way of looking. Even eddy current is an electric current flow that's causing an opposing magnetic flux.
No. Please review what Eddy Currents are and how they are generated. Thank you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddy_current

Eddy currents (also called Foucault's currents) are loops of electrical current induced within conductors by a changing magnetic field in the conductor according to Faraday's law of induction. Eddy currents flow in closed loops within conductors, in planes perpendicular to the magnetic field. They can be induced within nearby stationary conductors by a time-varying magnetic field created by an AC electromagnet or transformer, for example, or by relative motion between a magnet and a nearby conductor. The magnitude of the current in a given loop is proportional to the strength of the magnetic field, the area of the loop, and the rate of change of flux, and inversely proportional to the resistivity of the material. When graphed, these circular currents within a piece of metal look vaguely like eddies or whirlpools in a liquid.

By Lenz's law, an eddy current creates a magnetic field that opposes the change in the magnetic field that created it, and thus eddy currents react back on the source of the magnetic field. For example, a nearby conductive surface will exert a drag force on a moving magnet that opposes its motion, due to eddy currents induced in the surface by the moving magnetic field. This effect is employed in eddy current brakes which are used to stop rotating power tools quickly when they are turned off. The current flowing through the resistance of the conductor also dissipates energy as heat in the material. Thus eddy currents are a cause of energy loss in alternating current (AC) inductors, transformers, electric motors and generators, and other AC machinery, requiring special construction such as laminated magnetic cores or ferrite cores to minimize them. Eddy currents are also used to heat objects in induction heating furnaces and equipment, and to detect cracks and flaws in metal parts using eddy-current testing instruments.
 
berkeman said:
No. Please review what Eddy Currents are and how they are generated. Thank you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddy_current

I think there is a dot connecting these two processes (it's just different way of looking at it). I can try to find a reference and get back.

For example, why is the reflected light (or EM wave) 180 deg out of phase at the mirror interface? That's the lenz's law.
 
Last edited:
iVenky said:
I can try to find a reference and get back.
Thank you, that would be great. :smile:
 
iVenky said:
I think there is a dot connecting these two processes (it's just different way of looking at it).

As has been pointed out, eddy currents in an object have nothing to do with reflection
It's not a different way, it's just a plain wrong way
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and berkeman
I think part of the confusion in comparing these in the vernacular is that they have such different time/wavelength scales. Eddy currents work in the classical EM or maybe statistical mechanics world, large scale compared to the materials; currents flowing through metals. I never hardly ever hear people talking about RF photons. Light photons are usually considered more at the atomic level, eg. individual photons interacting with atoms/particles.

Yes at the large scale you can compare reflection at interfaces due to impedance/index changes in all scales of EM, but this is a classical approximation at large scale of a quantum world. It works great, but it's a little hard to explain if you question it deeply.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: iVenky
DaveE said:
I think part of the confusion in comparing these in the vernacular is that they have such different time/wavelength scales. Eddy currents work in the classical EM or maybe statistical mechanics world, large scale compared to the materials; currents flowing through metals. I never hardly ever hear people talking about RF photons. Light photons are usually considered more at the atomic level, eg. individual photons interacting with atoms/particles.

Yes at the large scale you can compare reflection at interfaces due to impedance/index changes in all scales of EM, but this is a classical approximation at large scale of a quantum world. It works great, but it's a little hard to explain if you question it deeply.

Yes, I was thinking along those lines. On a side note, there is a branch of physics called RF photonics :P though it's not exactly the same thing that we are talking about I guess.
 
  • #10
@iVenky I think you are confusing different modes of how EM waves propagate.

If you are thinking of a solenoid coil wound around an iron core and the coil energized with AC, then if you would put such an electromagnet's iron core end close to a conducting surface there would indeed be strong eddy currents generated within the surface. This is the reason why transformer and AC electromagnet cores are thin laminated metal sheets instead of a single chunk of metal. But this is all the so called "near field" phenomena.
The picture you seem to envision in your question has to do with high frequency EM waves like radio waves. The way they reflect off conducting surfaces is different than a B field from an electromagnet or induction coil would reflect from a surface that is very near the source.
 
  • #11
DaveE said:
I think part of the confusion in comparing these in the vernacular is that they have such different time/wavelength scales. Eddy currents work in the classical EM or maybe statistical mechanics world, large scale compared to the materials; currents flowing through metals. I never hardly ever hear people talking about RF photons. Light photons are usually considered more at the atomic level, eg. individual photons interacting with atoms/particles.

Yes at the large scale you can compare reflection at interfaces due to impedance/index changes in all scales of EM, but this is a classical approximation at large scale of a quantum world. It works great, but it's a little hard to explain if you question it deeply.

I see. Is it mainly because the wavelength is shorter compared to RF signals some of the RF concepts don't work here.

Given that for 100% reflection we need good conductive materials, is it related to the fact that perfect conductors have intrinsic impedance ~0 << air impedance that results in 180 deg reflection? (more like image theory in electromagnetics).
 

Similar threads

Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
16K
Replies
6
Views
4K