Can Light Travel Through Vacuum and Be Detected Off Its Path?

  • Thread starter Thread starter john101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
AI Thread Summary
Light can travel through a vacuum and be detected only when it directly interacts with a detector; it does not disturb the electromagnetic field in a detectable way off its path. When light is sent into a hollow reflective sphere, it will bounce indefinitely if perfectly reflective, but real-world conditions lead to gradual dissipation. Injecting more light into the sphere than it can dissipate will ultimately result in all light being lost, as even perfect mirrors absorb some percentage of incoming light. If the sphere's temperature is altered, it can affect the absorption rate of the mirrors, potentially leading to damage if the heat from absorbed light exceeds the material's tolerance. Therefore, while light can be manipulated within a reflective environment, its fundamental properties dictate that it cannot be detected unless it interacts directly with a detector.
john101
Messages
196
Reaction score
47
I asked myself this question : If you have a hollow sphere with reflective surface on the inside and send light into it what happens to the light? and found a number of places where the question has been asked and answered.

One answer : talked about electro magnetic field being everywhere even in vacuum before any light travels through it and went on to talk about the nature of light. This led me to another question.

If light is sent off through vacuum space to another point, is it possible to detect that light from a point not inline with the path of light? Does the light 'disturb' the electro magnetic field in a way that's detectable?

I have only high school physics from 40 years ago but I try to understand. I have no doubt that I use the wrong terms and concepts to formulate the question.
 
Science news on Phys.org
In real life, it will bounce back and forth a few thousand times before being dissipated to nothing. If you assume perfect reflectivity, it would bounce back and forth forever.

For the second question; light is only detectable when it hits a detector. You cannot detect it otherwise.
 
Thank you.

What happens if the sphere is very cold or very hot?

edit add: what if you send light into the sphere faster than it dissipates?
 
Last edited:
john101 said:
What happens if the sphere is very cold or very hot?

not sure how much heat or coolness of the material would affect absorption ?

you need to understand that any object above 0 K (zero Kelvin) is radiating EM
john101 said:
edit add: what if you send light into the sphere faster than it dissipates?

faster ? ... EM has a fixed speed in a given meduium
 
What I mean is if the amount of light entering the sphere is greater than the rate at which it dissipates. Even that sound a bit odd but surely what I'm trying to say is clear.?
 
john101 said:
what if you send light into the sphere faster than it dissipates?
Typically, a mirrored wall will absorb some percentage of the inbound light and reflect the rest. Accordingly, if you send in more light, the dissipation will increase in proportion. Ultimately, 100% of the incoming light will be lost regardless of how perfect the mirrors are, how they are angled or how fast you inject light into the enclosure. Inject more light and you lose more at each bounce. Improve the mirrors so that less is lost at each bounce and you get more bounces.

Of course, If you inject light faster than you can drain heat from the mirrors as the light is absorbed, you will eventually melt or vaporize the mirrors.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top