Can Magnets Really Create Perpetual Motion?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MadMike1986
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnets Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the feasibility of creating a perpetual motion machine using magnets and magnetic shielding materials. The proposed setup involves two magnets with opposite poles facing each other, separated by a magnetically shielding material. Participants concluded that the energy required to slide the shielding material in and out of position negates any potential work done by the magnets, as the magnetic field itself has energy and a shielded configuration represents a lower energy state. Thus, the concept of perpetual motion in this scenario is fundamentally flawed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic fields and forces
  • Knowledge of magnetic shielding materials and their properties
  • Basic principles of energy conservation
  • Familiarity with the concept of perpetual motion and its impossibility
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of magnetic shielding materials
  • Study the principles of energy conservation in physics
  • Explore the theoretical limits of perpetual motion machines
  • Learn about magnetic field interactions and their implications in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Physics enthusiasts, engineers, inventors, and anyone interested in the principles of magnetism and energy conservation.

MadMike1986
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Before I get flamed for proposing a perpetual motion machine, I would like to point out that I understand there is something fundamentally flawed in my logic. That is why I am posting this, I want someone to point out to me what I am missing to explain why this won't work.

Suppose you have two magnets positioned so that their opposite poles are facing toward each other. There is a magnetically shielding material in between the two magnets so that they do not move into contact with one another. Now suppose one magnet is held in place by a stop and the other magnet is free to move and located underneath the first with the magnetically shielding material somewhere in between the two but free to be slid in and out of the device. When the magnetically shielding material is removed, the top magnet pulls with enough force to move the bottom magnet up and into contact with the stop. Now the shielding material is slid back into the system and the bottom magnet falls back down. This can be done repeatedly. We now have devised an engine that can do work.

In my little thought experiment this seems completely valid to me, however i know something must be wrong. I would love to test this out physically but i don't have any magnetically shielding material. Can anyone point out to me why this will not work?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And how much energy is used to slide the shield in and out of position?
 
i don't know, are you suggesting that perhaps sliding the shielding material would take the same amount of energy as is being used by the bottom magnet moving upward. I have no idea how magnetically shielding material works, but i can only assume that it involves some sort of interaction with the magnetic field. I suppose that could explain it.
 
I think that may be it. the "Magnetic shielding" material would itself act like a magnet. Magnetic dipoles within the material flip to cancel the magnetic field of the lower magnet. It would take work to pull this material out of the way.
 
Hi MadMike, the bottom line is that magnets can do work but your scenario won't work for the reason alluded to by f95toli.

The magnetic field itself has energy, if you have a magnetic shielding material then that material reduces the magnetic field which means that a shielded configuration is a lower energy state than an unshielded configuration. The magnet will therefore do work on the shield as you put it in and it will take an equal amount of work to pull the shield out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
662
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K