Can Magnets Repel Each Other When Charged? Find Out Here!

  • Thread starter Thread starter PieintheSky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnets
AI Thread Summary
Magnets have distinct positive and negative ends, and they attract opposites while repelling like charges. When two magnets are placed together, attaching a battery to one does not create a current that would alter their magnetic properties. Magnetic force and electrostatic force are fundamentally different; static charges cannot cancel out magnetic forces. The interaction of magnetic fields with moving charges follows the Lorentz law, indicating that negative charges do not behave the same way in magnetic fields as they do in electric fields. Therefore, the scenario described would not result in the top magnet hovering or being pushed off the bottom magnet.
PieintheSky
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Ok, so by no means am i extensively knowledgeable in physics, and the question I'm about to post may or may not have an obvious answer.

SO suppose i have two magnets. Obviously, magnets have a negative and a positive end. Naturally the opposite charges attract, and when you try to push like charged ends together, they repel.

Now imagine the two magnets, one placed on top of the other. The positive end of the bottom magnet is facing up, and the negative end of the top magnet is facing down. The magnets are stuck together at this point. Now, we attach a battery to the bottom magnet using gator cables, causing negatively charged electrons to flow through the magnet. Would this cause the bottom magnet to incur a negative charge, thus repelling the negatively charged end of the top magnet? And if so, would the top magnet hover in place above the bottom magnet, or would it be pushed off the bottom magnet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PieintheSky said:
Ok, so by no means am i extensively knowledgeable in physics, and the question I'm about to post may or may not have an obvious answer.

SO suppose i have two magnets. Obviously, magnets have a negative and a positive end. Naturally the opposite charges attract, and when you try to push like charged ends together, they repel.

Now imagine the two magnets, one placed on top of the other. The positive end of the bottom magnet is facing up, and the negative end of the top magnet is facing down. The magnets are stuck together at this point. Now, we attach a battery to the bottom magnet using gator cables, causing negatively charged electrons to flow through the magnet. Would this cause the bottom magnet to incur a negative charge, thus repelling the negatively charged end of the top magnet? And if so, would the top magnet hover in place above the bottom magnet, or would it be pushed off the bottom magnet?

Attaching one pole of a battery to one end of one magnet will not cause a current to flow and will not cause charge to move.

Also, magnetic force is not the same thing as electrostatic force. You cannot cancel it with a static charge. To a crude approximation, magnetic force operates at right angles to moving charges.
 
Like Jbriggs said, negative charges don't interact with magnetic fields they way they do with electric fields. Look of the Lorentz law.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top