Can maxwell's EM theory explain the photoelectric effect?

needguidance
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
i know that einstein explained it in terms of particles but can maxwells EM waves explain the photoelectric effect aswell?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
needguidance said:
i know that einstein explained it in terms of particles but can maxwells EM waves explain the photoelectric effect aswell?

This is a bit strange, because since the classical E&M theory was in existence long before the Einstein's photoelectric effect model, one would think that if the classical E&M theory at that time can already describe the photoelectric effect, the phenomenon won't be THAT big of a "puzzle" at that time, will it?

Have you read anything about the http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/photoelectric_effect.html" ?

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
needguidance said:
i know that einstein explained it in terms of particles but can maxwells EM waves explain the photoelectric effect aswell?

That depends what you mean by "the photoelectric effect." If you're simply asking whether classical EM predicts that shining light on a metal will cause it to emit electrons, the answer is yes. If you're asking whether classical EM can reproduce the particular properties of photoelectric emission that led Einstein to think about it in terms of particles of light, the answer is maybe, depending on what kind of quantum mechanical model you introduce for the metal. But, if you're asking whether classical EM can reproduce all properties of the photoelectric effect that have been observed through the present, the answer is no.
 
needguidance said:
i know that einstein explained it in terms of particles but can maxwells EM waves explain the photoelectric effect aswell?

In my opinion, no. The mechanism whereby the Maxwellian fields (which are continuous in space and time) interact with electric charge is via the Lorentz force law. In brief, the Maxwell/Lorentz force on charged particles occurs continuously in space and time. In Einstein's explanation of the photoelectric effect, the interaction between the field and a charged particle occurs impulsively, essentially at a given point in space/time. Of course the lame answer is that if the photoelectric effect did not introduce a new paradigm for field/particle interactions, then why did Einstein get the Nobel prize?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top