Can Microorganisms Help Us Understand Aging Rates on Other Planets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ozzlight
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    aging Planets
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the potential differences in aging rates for humans living on various planets, particularly Mars, compared to Earth. It suggests that sending microorganisms to other planets in sealed containers could provide insights into aging, although this method may not fully account for environmental factors like cosmic radiation and atmospheric conditions. The impact of gravity on aging is also highlighted, with planets like Jupiter having significantly higher gravity that could reduce lifespan, while lower gravity on planets like Pluto and Mercury could lead to muscle atrophy. Additionally, the conversation raises the question of whether studying aging through living organisms is the best approach, proposing alternative methods such as using time-based clocks. Overall, the complexities of aging in different planetary environments warrant further investigation.
ozzlight
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
To keep track let's take a trip to 'Imagination Land' (no not the south park version!). Now imagine that the 8 planets and pluto in the solar system are places where humans can live, would the age rate differ from planet to planet? Now let's get back to reality. We may be able to send humans to Mars so would be interesting to see if 'Martian Humans' Live longer than 'Earthling Humans', but to be honest I don't have a couple of centuries to live to see how the age rate over generations evolve on Mars. BUT isn't it possible to send micro living organisms to other planets, in a safe container which MUST not contaminate the planet it visits, and study the age rate of cells and compare... this could be done surely?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
If the cells are sealed from the Martian environment, to prevent contamination, then we would not really be testing the aging rate on Mars. We might be getting some aspects, like the rate of bombardment by cosmic rays that could contribute to aging, but not the whole enchilada. Still, that could give a partial answer to your question-- I would imagine any planet with a much weaker magnetic field than Earth and a much thinner atmosphere than Earth would be more susceptible to bombardment by DNA-damaging particles from space. Also, any planet with no ozone layer that is not too far from the Sun will experience more harmful UV light from the Sun. These kinds of damaging environments could certainly lead to a process we might associate with aging, I should think.
 
ozzlight said:
Now imagine that the 8 planets and pluto in the solar system are places where humans can live, would the age rate differ from planet to planet?
Sure. To add to Ken G's points regarding the dangers of incoming radiation, let's extend an assumption that either a friendly atmosphere or suits and living environment could protect 100% from radiation as we enjoy on Earth. The human body will also be subject to different gravitation - the greatest found at Jupiter - NASA lists its surface gravity at about 2.5 times that of Earth. That should lessen one's lifetime.

Planets who's gravity is much less than Earth's (Pluto < 10% and Mercury near 40%) present a different problem in that the human body is currently designed to thrive with Earth's gravity with reasonable exercise. (Think atrophy from decreased exertion of muscles. Astronauts who are away from the Earth's gravity can develop decreased muscle tone after just a few days of weightlessness.
 
In other words: "aging" is not a well defined term ... you are thinking only of the "rate time passes" contribution to aging.
Rather than study this rate using living organisms, which presents a number of problems, why not study the age rate with other kinds of clocks?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top