Can Nanoscale Vibrations Affect Particle Positioning?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeberd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
Nanoscale vibrations may impact particle positioning, but challenges arise when scaling down to ~10nm particles with ~100nm spacing. The vibrational nodes of the substrate remain unchanged, which could disrupt the intended positioning effect. Increasing frequency proportionally may force nodes closer together, but the implications of this adjustment are unclear. The discussion highlights uncertainty about the effects of changing the physical composition of the plate on particle behavior. Overall, while the concept is intriguing, significant questions about feasibility and mechanics remain unanswered.
jeberd
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
First watch the video clip below of salt being positioned on a vibrating substrate...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9GBf8y0lY0"

...Then tell me why you think that this wouldn't work if I shrunk everything down so that the particles being used were ~10nm diameter and the spacings were ~100nm between features. I am hoping that it will, but I want to see where others foresee problems arising.

EDIT: and the frequency increased proportionally
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The vibrational nodes of the plate wouldn't change, so the relative scale would be totally trashed. I'm not sure what the effect of that would be. In order to change the nodes, you would also have to change the physical composition of the plate. Again, the effect is unknown (to me).
 
@Danger: Sorry, The frequency would also be scaled up to force the nodes together
 
[Double Post]If you think that it does work, leave a quick comment attesting so, please. Also, the video is somewhat interesting in of itself, so even if you don't want to help me out, you might get some entertainment from it.

Thanks.
 
I've actually seen that video before, and I agree that it's really neat to watch. As for wanting to help you... I wish that I could. Unfortunately, I just don't know anything about it. My first response was just a shot in the dark to let you know that your presence is welcome. :smile:
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top