B Can negative roots of a quadratic equation for √E be physically acceptable?

Alex_physics
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
In a certain type of problem, a quadratic equation is formed with the square root of energy being the variable to be found ex: (a*sqrt(E)^2+b*sqrt(E)+c=0). Then they claim since energy (E) is real and positive, only solutions to the quadratic equation in sqrt(E ) being real and positive are physically acceptable.

sqrt(E) can still be negative (and so the solutions to the quadratic equation) which gives a positive E is my assumption. Is their claim correct ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In the equation they give, it is possible that they are actually solving for a scaled version of the velocity. If the equation is truly for the square root of the energy,(I'm presuming their referring to kinetic energy and it doesn't include potential energy which can be negative), then only positive roots would be acceptable and negative solutions would be extraneous. If the equation is solving for a scaled version of the velocity, (oftentimes energy ## E=\frac{1}{2}mv^2 ##), then taking the square of the negative root would give the energy. (The velocity ## v ## is allowed to be negative.)
 
  • Like
Likes Alex_physics
Charles Link said:
In the equation they give, it is possible that they are actually solving for a scaled version of the velocity. If the equation is truly for the square root of the energy,(I'm presuming their referring to kinetic energy and it doesn't include potential energy which can be negative), then only positive roots would be acceptable and negative solutions would be extraneous. If the equation is solving for a scaled version of the velocity, (oftentimes energy ## E=\frac{1}{2}mv^2 ##), then taking the square of the negative root would give the energy. (The velocity ## v ## is allowed to be negative.)

Thank you for your answer.
The equation is truly for the square root of energy.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top