Can New Reactants Reduce Nitric Oxide Pollution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ninjaDUDE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a proposal to explore new reactants that could effectively reduce nitric oxide pollution, a major contributor to urban smog. The project aims to identify compounds that can break down nitric oxide and form harmless alternatives, thereby mitigating environmental threats. It highlights the chemical processes involved, particularly the transformation of nitric oxide into nitrogen dioxide and its subsequent breakdown under sunlight, which contributes to ozone formation. The feasibility of releasing these new compounds into the atmosphere at controlled rates is also considered. Successful identification of suitable reactants could provide a practical solution to combat air pollution.
ninjaDUDE
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Is this a feasible experiment?

Preliminary Proposal:

Observing the Relative Strength of Chemical Bonds with Nitrogen and Nitric Oxide in Order to Determine the Ideal Compound or Element to Break and Form New Harmless Compounds as to Replace the Existing Pollutant - Nitric oxide

One of the main sources of pollution in the world today is the oxidation of exhaust gases. Many large cities have a photochemical smog which is in the air, giving it a brownish tint. This smog is produced from the exhaust released by cigarettes, automobiles, and power plants. When the nitric oxide is released, it bonds with oxygen thus forming nitrogen dioxide; however intense sunlight makes the compound decompose back into nitric oxide and simultaneously freeing an extremely reactive oxygen atom which may form highly toxic ozone. This project will investigate other possible reactants that would produce a more stable compound (relative to that of nitric oxide) that would be harmless in order to successfully remove its being a threat to the environment. If this is found to be possible then it may be practical to release large amounts of this substance into the air at the proper rate to compensate for the amount of pollutant already existing, and yet to come, into the air. To verify whether a certain element or compound is capable of this and which one is best, one would compare and contrast reaction rates of their bonding with nitrogen and breaking the bonds of a fixed amount of nitric oxide.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


oh, and hi mr. reeves in case you're checking this
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top