I Can Newton's Theory of Gravity Explain Planetary Elliptical Orbits?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter kent davidge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbits Planets
AI Thread Summary
Newton's theory of gravity can explain planetary orbits, but demonstrating that they are elliptical is more complex than assuming circular orbits. The mechanics book by Kleppner and Kolenkow provides a solid derivation of these concepts. Orbits can also take parabolic or hyperbolic shapes if the escape velocity is sufficient. Using Lagrange's equations of motion can help identify allowed orbits, although it may require significant effort unless the solutions are already known. The discussion emphasizes that an object's trajectory involves both position and velocity, not just a static path.
kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
Is it difficult to use Newton's theory of gravity for showing that planet's orbits must be elliptical?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not tremendously difficult, but not nearly as simple as assuming circular orbits. The mechanics book by Kleppner and Kolenkow has a good derivation of this.
 
They can also be parabolic or hyperbolic, if the planet has a sufficient escape velocity. Finding the allowed orbits from Lagrange's equations of motion may require some work, unless you already know the solution (in which case you can test it by substitution).
 
I imagined the following approach. The equation of an ellipse is ##x^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2 = 1##. If we define ##\bar{x} = x / a, \bar{y} = y / b## we have ##\bar{x}^2+ \bar{y}^2 = 1## which is the equation of a unit sphere.

Of course that satisfy Newton's equation of gravity and so do ##x^2 / a^2## and ##y^2 / b^2##.
 
The trajectory of an object is not just a set of points, like a circle on the plane. The object has both a position and velocity at every instant.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
12K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top