Can nonholonomic constraints always be expressed as inequalities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter espen180
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constraints
AI Thread Summary
Nonholonomic constraints can often be expressed as inequalities involving system coordinates, as illustrated by the example of a ball rolling down a sphere. However, not all nonholonomic constraints can be represented this way; some involve relationships between velocities that cannot be integrated into coordinate relationships. An example is the rolling motion of an object without slipping, which is defined by an equality between tangential velocities rather than an inequality. This highlights the complexity of nonholonomic constraints in mechanical systems. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately modeling such systems.
espen180
Messages
831
Reaction score
2
So far, every nonholonomic constraint I have seen can be expressed as a collection of inequalities involving the coordinates of the system. For example, a small ball rolling down a sphere with radius a has the constraint r^2-a^2\geq 0, where r is the radial coordinate of the ball.

Can every nonholonomic constraint be written in this form? If not, I would appreciate a counterexample.

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
espen180, Nonholonomic means nonintegrable. They can be inequalities, but often they are relationships involving the velocities which can't be integrated to yield a relationship between coordinates. For example when an object rolls without slipping on another, the constraint is an equality between the tangential velocities. Picture a quarter standing up and rolling around on a tabletop.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top