Can One Observe Anything Falling Into a Black Hole?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the observation of objects falling into black holes, particularly focusing on the implications for distant observers and the nature of black hole formation. It touches on theoretical aspects of spacetime, event horizons, and the limitations of observation in the context of black holes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that an asymptotically far-away observer will never see an object fall into a black hole, while others note that different coordinate systems may allow for different interpretations of this observation.
  • It is proposed that while an object cannot be observed crossing the event horizon, it can be seen approaching it arbitrarily closely over time.
  • One participant mentions that the formation of a black hole represents a different spacetime than a pre-existing black hole, yet maintains that nothing can be observed crossing the event horizon.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of singularities, with some participants indicating that the singularity at the Schwarzschild radius is a coordinate singularity, while the true singularity exists at the center of the black hole.
  • A philosophical perspective is introduced regarding the existence of black holes and the implications of mass crossing the event horizon in relation to simultaneity for distant observers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the observability of objects falling into black holes and the nature of black hole formation. There is no consensus on whether anything can be observed crossing the event horizon, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of different coordinate systems.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on coordinate choices and the unresolved nature of how observers perceive events in relation to black holes and their formation.

Replusz
Messages
141
Reaction score
14
TL;DR
Statements 1-3, are they correct?
Questions a and b, please answer : )
1. So for an asymptotically far-away observer, something falling towards a black hole will never reach it
2. However, the thing falling in will reach the event horizon is finite affine parameter
3. The Universe has a finite age for an asymptotically far away observer

a) Does this mean that one can never observe anything falling into a black hole?
b) My lecturer noted that 'one cannot observe a black hole forming', did I hear this correctly? But then why are there black holes?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
1 is coordinate dependent. Certainly they will never see an object fall into a black hole, and certainly the usual Schwarzschild coordinates reflect this, but the distant observer may adopt other coordinates in which the object falls in in finite time.

3 is true for everybody, so far as I am aware, not just the distant observer.

Indeed you cannot observe anything falling into a black hole, although if you wait long enough you can (in principle) see it approach arbitrarily close.

A forming black hole is a somewhat different spacetime from a pre-existing one, but it is still the case that you cannot observe anything crossing an event horizon - by definition, since light cannot escape it. So no, you cannot observe a black hole form. However you can observe the mass of the maybe-black-hole from the orbits of test objects, and you can probe with light rays to show that the object is compact within its Schwarzschild radius plus an arbitrarily small distance - small enough that the matter cannot possibly resist collapse.

I suppose there's a philosophical sense in which black holes "don't yet exist" because "now" their mass hasn't crossed the horizon according to the obvious simultaneity criterion for a distant observer. I'd say it's just one of those cases where everyday language isn't really capable of handling the concepts, and not worry about it otherwise.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and vanhees71
2. is also correct. Using the particle's proper time there's nothing special at all when it crosses the Schwarzschild horizon. There's also nothing special at all, i.e., the singularity at the Schwarzschild radius is a coordinate singularity of the usual Schwarzschild coordinates. The only true singularity is the center of the black hole itself (i.e., ##r=0## of the usual Schwarzschild coordinates).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K