Can parallel spin antiproton annihilate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter snorkack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel Spin
snorkack
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
536
Positronium annihilation opportunities are strongly restricted by the requirement to conserve spin. The spin of a photon is 1; and for some reasons two photons are completely unable to have spins in different directions. They can only have parallel spins (total 2) or antiparallel spins (total 0) - never 1, and this prevents a positron with spin parallel to an electron from annihilating to 2 photons. Only 3 photons are possible (also 5 or larger odd numbers) which is very much slower process.

Now how about antiproton?
The problem here is that antiprotons are said to annihilate normally into pions - but pion spin is 0.

No matter how many pions are produced, whether 3, 4, 5 or more, no combination of pions can possibly handle the combined spin of proton and antiproton with parallel spins.

So is such annihilation possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In addition to conservation of angular momentum, the analysis involves conservation of C and P. It gets rather complicated. But quoting the answer,

"The singlet ground state 1S0 of para-protonium can decay only into three pions. Whereas the ortho-protonium 3S1 can decay either into two or three pions, but never into a system of uncharged pions only. (The 3π decay of ortho-protonium is much less probable than the 2π decay. Not only because the phase space is much smaller, but also because already the simplest 3π state has a high centrifugal barrier.)"
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top