Can Physical Outcomes Ever Be 100% Predictable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Physical outcomes are not 100% predictable due to chaos theory, which highlights the sensitivity of dynamical systems to initial conditions. Even slight variations in these conditions can lead to vastly different results, as demonstrated by Lorentz's findings in weather prediction. While some argue that outcomes can be predicted if all variables are known, this is not universally applicable. Quantum mechanics further complicates predictability, as the collapse of the wavefunction is inherently stochastic. Therefore, the consensus remains that complete predictability is unattainable in many systems.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Is any physical outcome 100% predictable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Loren
If you believe in chaos theory, the answer is no. Dynamical systems are highly sensitive to initial conditions. It means that if you want to calculate the outcome of a process, you have to know the exact values of the initial conditions, and this is impossible. Initial conditions very similar, but different after all, give very different results. This is what surprised Lorentz when he discovered that slightly different initial conditions forecast very different weathers
 
Originally posted by meteor
Hi Loren
If you believe in chaos theory, the answer is no. Dynamical systems are highly sensitive to initial conditions. It means that if you want to calculate the outcome of a process, you have to know the exact values of the initial conditions, and this is impossible. Initial conditions very similar, but different after all, give very different results. This is what surprised Lorentz when he discovered that slightly different initial conditions forecast very different weathers

The outcome of chaotic systems can be predicted 100%, if all the variables are known, also not all systems are chaotic.

The answer's still no though 'cos in QM the collapse of the wavefunction is a stochastic process.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top