Can Physics Optimize the Storage of L Beams in a Confined Space?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around optimizing the storage of L beams in a confined space measuring 21.06 cm x 7.02 cm x 7.02 cm. Participants suggest that this problem resembles a mathematical packaging challenge similar to Tetris rather than a purely physics-based issue. The idea of using a physics simulation to find the optimal arrangement is questioned, with suggestions leaning towards mathematical solutions instead. The conversation also touches on practical considerations, such as the dimensions of LEGO Technic pieces and the marketing implications of packaging sizes. Ultimately, the focus remains on finding the most efficient theoretical arrangement for the beams.
SNIPE
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi

What is the most efficient way to theoretically store an L beam in a given area, the more beams in that area the better, obvioustly this can't be done in real life but with a physics engine could maybe be calculated?

Note: Each beam can be at any rotation or any axis.

The area is 21.06 cm x 7.02 cm x 7.02 cm and the dimentions of a single beam is shown below.

rsalch.jpg


Im not sure if this is a physics question, but am thinking it can be solved using physics?

Regards, Snipe
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Sounds to me like a math problem a la tetris.
 
SNIPE said:
rsalch.jpg
I agree with phinds that this more of a math-packaging problem. A physics simulation that "shakes a box" containing these pieces doesn't seem like the most efficient way.

PS: Is this a LEGO-Technic piece? If you are in charge of optimizing the LEGO boxes, keep in mind that they are big for marketing reasons.
 
Ok Ill ask on a maths forum

Thanks!

PS yeah its technic, I have hundres of them and getting tray storage is hard for what I need
 
SNIPE said:
What is the most efficient way to theoretically store an L beam in a given area

Area? Or volume?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top