Can Pre-Processing EEG Signals Affect Correlation Coefficients?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaushik200
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Signals
AI Thread Summary
Filtering EEG signals below 0.5 Hz and notching out 50 Hz may introduce phase changes that could affect correlation coefficients between signals from different electrodes. The discussion clarifies that the focus is on correlating signals within the same frequency bands (0.5-4 Hz, 4-8 Hz, 8-12 Hz, and 12-16 Hz) to ensure consistency in processing. Concerns are raised about the impact of digital filter-induced phase delays on correlation values. Suggestions for mitigating these effects are sought, emphasizing the importance of appropriate filtering techniques. The conversation underscores the necessity of clear pre-processing to maintain the integrity of correlation analyses.
kaushik200
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I need to calculate the correlation betweeen a pair of eeg signals in various bands (delta, theta, alpha...). Before I do so, I am filtering out frequencies below 0.5 Hz. (and also notching out 50 Hz.) I wonder whether the phase changes introduced by these filtering operations would affect my correlation coefficient. If yes, what kind of filter should I use? My prime objective is to study the correlation between different electrode pairs and I am concerned about these values getting affected by pre-processing.

Kaushik
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
kaushik200 said:
Hello,
I need to calculate the correlation betweeen a pair of eeg signals in various bands (delta, theta, alpha...). Before I do so, I am filtering out frequencies below 0.5 Hz. (and also notching out 50 Hz.) I wonder whether the phase changes introduced by these filtering operations would affect my correlation coefficient. If yes, what kind of filter should I use? My prime objective is to study the correlation between different electrode pairs and I am concerned about these values getting affected by pre-processing.

Kaushik

At first it sounds like you want to correlate signals of different frequencies, but that doesn't sound right. But then it sounds like you want to correlate signals in the same band, but from spatially separate electrodes (which sounds better). If the two signals are in the same band with the same processing, I think the processing should not have a big effect on the correlation.

Could you please clarify what you will be correlating?
 
berkeman said:
At first it sounds like you want to correlate signals of different frequencies, but that doesn't sound right. But then it sounds like you want to correlate signals in the same band, but from spatially separate electrodes (which sounds better). If the two signals are in the same band with the same processing, I think the processing should not have a big effect on the correlation.

Could you please clarify what you will be correlating?

Hi, sorry for not being clear enough. eeg readings have been taken from 45 different electrode positions on the scalp @ 256 samples/sec. These signals usually do not have components greater than 128 Hz. I intend to calculate time correlation coefficient between each pair of signal (there are 45c2 pairs) in 4 different bands of interest (0.5-4,4-8,8-12,12-16). Before I do so, all signals are bandlimited to within 0.5-64 Hz. (as a pre-processing formality) to remove very low and high freq. I wonder if the phase delay introduced by these digital filters (while pre-processing as well as while choosing the band of interest) would have a strong impact on the calculated correlation value. If so, I am looking for suggestions as to how to combat this.
 
kaushik200 said:
Hi, sorry for not being clear enough. eeg readings have been taken from 45 different electrode positions on the scalp @ 256 samples/sec. These signals usually do not have components greater than 128 Hz. I intend to calculate time correlation coefficient between each pair of signal (there are 45c2 pairs) in 4 different bands of interest (0.5-4,4-8,8-12,12-16). Before I do so, all signals are bandlimited to within 0.5-64 Hz. (as a pre-processing formality) to remove very low and high freq. I wonder if the phase delay introduced by these digital filters (while pre-processing as well as while choosing the band of interest) would have a strong impact on the calculated correlation value. If so, I am looking for suggestions as to how to combat this.

So you are only correlating signals within the same frequency band, correct?
 
berkeman said:
So you are only correlating signals within the same frequency band, correct?

Yes, of course :)
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top