Can Protons and Neutrons Behave Like an Ideal Gas?

SandeshPhy
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
can a gas of neutrons said to behave like ideal gas?
neutrons almost satisfy all postulates of kinetic theory.(except maybe about Newtons laws)

Also can a gas of protons said to be a ideal gas?
protons could be said to be simply hydrogen with electrons removed.
the electrons don't have major role in dynamics of atoms.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say neutrons could fit all the assumption in the kinetic theory of gases therefore a good candidate.
Protons are +charged and therefore, I would say, do not satisfy the assumption that there is no force between particles used in the development of the kinetic theory...unless there is a very low concentration of protons ?
 
technician said:
I would say neutrons could fit all the assumption in the kinetic theory of gases therefore a good candidate.
Protons are +charged and therefore, I would say, do not satisfy the assumption that there is no force between particles used in the development of the kinetic theory...unless there is a very low concentration of protons ?

But for neutrons can we say Newton's laws will be fully applicable??
 
For neutrons you can have an ideal gas, as long as the density is low enough, but for protons, no, because they are charged particles. For forces that fall off quickly enough, you can have an ideal gas if the density is low enough, but the electromagnetic force does not fall off quickly enough.
 
Electrons in a metal are siad to behave like an ideal gas and is the basis for theory of conduction.
 
Yes. The metal atoms are positively charged, so the electrons don't feel repulsion from each other over long distances, because the metal ions counteract the negative charge of the electrons.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top