Can Puddle Derail a Train? Physics Experts Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Donald Josephso
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Train
AI Thread Summary
A large enough puddle could potentially derail a passenger train, particularly if it creates conditions that lead to rapid deceleration. If a train traveling at 50 mph encounters three feet of standing water due to drainage issues, the compression force on the leading cars might cause them to lift and derail. Once one car derails, it could pull others along or damage the track. However, the locomotive itself is less likely to derail unless the rails are significantly displaced. Overall, while unlikely, certain conditions could lead to a train being derailed by water accumulation.
Donald Josephso
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I need some physics experts to help settle a debate between me and a coworker. Would it be possible for a large enough puddle to derail a passenger train? Obviously if you tried to drive a train through a lake it would derail, but could there ever be enough water from heavy rainfall to do the trick? Reasonable assumptions regarding speed (50mph) and train size (10-15 cars).
Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
How would the puddle form? In the USA, the rails are set on an small elevated bed of rocks, and there's a drainage setup on both sides of the tracks.
 
Assuming there is some drainage issue, either blocking, or a less than ideal setup. Basically the debate hinges on whether water could derail a train, let's say 3 feet of standing water. Hope this helps, thx.
 
If there was sufficient water to decelerate the train fast enough, the compression force on the leading passenger cars could be enough to lift them up (accordion) and derail them. Once one of them goes, the couplings can pull the other cars along, or the rails of the tracks can get ripped up from the side loads. Note that virtually nothing short of the rails themselves being displaced is going to derail the locomotive car if it's in front.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top