Can Pure Water Conduct Electricity? Why?

AI Thread Summary
Pure water is not a conductor of electricity; it acts as an insulator. Although pure water has a net dipole moment due to hydrogen-oxygen bonding, this characteristic does not enable it to conduct electricity. For a liquid to conduct electricity, it must contain ions that can move freely, allowing for the flow of electric current. In pure water, the absence of these charged particles means it cannot conduct electricity effectively. Thus, despite its molecular structure, pure water remains a poor conductor.
imran
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
is pure water conductor of electricity or an insulator.why?
pure water has H-O bonding and as a result it has net dipole moment which will be helpfull for conduction.
please ans as iam dying of curiosity.
iam thankfull for ur ans.kindly go for it! :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
imran said:
is pure water conductor of electricity or an insulator.why?

No... Pure water is not a conductor

imran said:
pure water has H-O bonding and as a result it has net dipole moment which will be helpfull for conduction.
Yes, water molecules is a dipole, but the dipole won't make water become a conductor.
In order for a liquid behaves like conductor, that liquid must contain ions (charged particle). The ions move freely inside liquid. While we applied a voltage on a liquid. Positive ions will attracted by anode (the negative end of battery) and negative ions will attracted by cathode (positive end). The movement of ions (charged particle) called current...
A dipole is a molecule with positive charge at one end and negative charge at the other end. If we applied an (uniform) external electric field on dipole..since it contains both positive and negative charge, the push and the pull force will cancel each other out, the dipole will not attracted by the electric field. Therefore pure water is not a good conductor.
 
thank you.now i understood.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top