Can Quantum Entanglement Enable Time Loops and Superluminal Communication?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stglyde
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Loop Time
stglyde
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
They say that if quantum entanglement were meditated by actually superluminal exchange, causality is not violated because you can't use it to send information. This is because quantum randomness can't be control. But note there is still actual exchange of randomness information between past and future... that is.. messages from the future could actually alter the past in quantum entangelement that uses superluminal exchange scenerio). Now I just want to have an idea if there were other actual experiments where random information can go from future to past (time loop). Is there no way to test it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stglyde said:
They say that if quantum entanglement were meditated by actually superluminal exchange, causality is not violated because you can't use it to send information. This is because quantum randomness can't be control. But note there is still actual exchange of randomness information between past and future... that is.. messages from the future could actually alter the past in quantum entangelement that uses superluminal exchange scenerio). Now I just want to have an idea if there were other actual experiments where random information can go from future to past (time loop). Is there no way to test it?

If you can figure out how to test it then you might get a phone call from Stockholm.
 
PatrickPowers said:
If you can figure out how to test it then you might get a phone call from Stockholm.

Isn't it that in quantum entanglement like Aspect experiment.. there are frames in which either end would trigger the event back in time? This is because if someone occurs instantaneously in separate spacetime points.. there would always be frame in which one end receives it back in time.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top