Can Quantum Tunnelling Explain the Physicist's Ice Cream Parlor Strategy?

autodidude
Messages
332
Reaction score
0
On the sitcom 'The Big Bang Theory', one of the jokes goes:

"A physicist walks into an ice cream parlor and orders an ice cream for himself and one for the empty seat next to him. He does this for weeks until the owner asks him what he's doing. The physicist says, "well, I'm a physicist, and quantum mechanics tells us that the matter above this stool to spontaneously change into a beautiful woman, who might accept my offer and fall in love with me. The owner says that lots of beautiful women come in here. Why not buy an ice cream for them? The physicist says, "yeah, but what are the odds of that happening?"

In the DVD feature, the science consultant says that it's based on quantum tunnelling...could someone explain it a bit more in layman's terms? Sounds really interesting

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's not exactly correct. The materialization of a beautiful woman has more to do with uncertainty principle and wave function collapse. Related concepts, but not the same thing.

At any rate, tunneling is what allows a particle to cross from point A to point B even if it does not have enough energy to be between these two points. For example, in a tunneling microscope, there is a voltage applied between the needle and the sample, but it's not high enough to overcome attraction between electrons and atoms in the needle, so an electron cannot classically cross the gap between needle and sample. However, if you get the needle sufficiently close, the current still flows, as electrons tunnel from needle to sample. Because probability of tunneling decreases exponentially with distance, the tunneling current is extremely sensitive to the distance, allowing tunneling microscope to map out the surface of the sample.
 
A more simpler way to envision it is to imagine trying to walk from A to B, but you reach a hill. If you decide to walk over that hill, it will cost you more energy than taking the shortcut, which would be a tunnel straight through it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top