Can Quarks Move Between Nucleons or Change Arrangement Within One Nucleon?

Mihai Dinu
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
The strong interaction keeps the quarks in very stable triplets or due to internal dynamics the quarks are re-arranged in nucleons from time to time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The quarks don't have well-defined positions inside the nucleons, there are no "arrangements" that could change.
Not even the total number of quarks (valence plus sea quarks) is a well-defined quantity.
 
Are you asking whether quarks move between one nucleon and another, or are you asking whether they change their arrangement within one nucleon? It's not obvious to me whether the former is a well-defined question, since they're identical particles.
 
  • Like
Likes arivero
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top