Can Relativity Help Create a Powerful Energy Generator?

TinManZin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm thinking that if you had a fan, rotating really really fast, then according to relativity the ends of the fan blades would think that the center of the fan has less energy than they do, and the center would think that the ends have less energy than it does right? So if this fan was made of a conductive material, then both the center and the ends would try to send energy to the other right? And if the center and ends had significant mass you'd be dealing with a huge difference in energy right? So then you could put something between the center and the ends and collect all of the energy they're giving off? Trick matter into giving up it's ridiculously large amount of energy. Possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The short answer is no. It's true that the energy of an object depends on the frame of reference you are in. But the statement "has less energy than it does" doesn't make any sense. Things start to go downhill from there.
 
If it's true that energy depends on the frame of reference, than why is it wrong to say "has less energy that it does"?
 
TinManZin said:
according to relativity the ends of the fan blades would think that the center of the fan has less energy than they do, and the center would think that the ends have less energy than it does right?
There is no inertial frame in which the second part (highlighted in bold) is correct according to relativity. In all inertial frames the center has less kinetic energy than the ends. Also, in order to collect that energy you must slow the blades down, they don't just "give off" the energy without a decrease in their energy.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top