Can Relativity Help Create a Powerful Energy Generator?

TinManZin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm thinking that if you had a fan, rotating really really fast, then according to relativity the ends of the fan blades would think that the center of the fan has less energy than they do, and the center would think that the ends have less energy than it does right? So if this fan was made of a conductive material, then both the center and the ends would try to send energy to the other right? And if the center and ends had significant mass you'd be dealing with a huge difference in energy right? So then you could put something between the center and the ends and collect all of the energy they're giving off? Trick matter into giving up it's ridiculously large amount of energy. Possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The short answer is no. It's true that the energy of an object depends on the frame of reference you are in. But the statement "has less energy than it does" doesn't make any sense. Things start to go downhill from there.
 
If it's true that energy depends on the frame of reference, than why is it wrong to say "has less energy that it does"?
 
TinManZin said:
according to relativity the ends of the fan blades would think that the center of the fan has less energy than they do, and the center would think that the ends have less energy than it does right?
There is no inertial frame in which the second part (highlighted in bold) is correct according to relativity. In all inertial frames the center has less kinetic energy than the ends. Also, in order to collect that energy you must slow the blades down, they don't just "give off" the energy without a decrease in their energy.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top