Can self-training lead to becoming a successful inventor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EngTechno
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To become a successful inventor, self-training techniques are crucial alongside formal education. While attending prestigious universities like MIT or CalTech can provide valuable resources and networking opportunities, self-motivation and practical experience are equally important. Engaging in hands-on projects, collaborating with peers, and continuously learning about patent processes and market needs can enhance inventive skills. The patenting process is complex and costly, often requiring thousands of dollars and legal assistance, which underscores the importance of creating inventions that companies find valuable enough to license rather than circumvent. Ultimately, the focus should be on developing innovative ideas that meet market demands while navigating the intricacies of patent law effectively.
EngTechno
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
What are the best self-training techniques to become an inventor? I am a 25 year-old undergraduate Mechanical-Aerospace engineering student. I look forward to become a patent-holder within 10 years. Do I have to get a degree from Top Universities like MIT, CalTech and others in addition to self-motivation? What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EngTechno said:
What are the best self-training techniques to become an inventor? I am a 25 year-old undergraduate Mechanical-Aerospace engineering student. I look forward to become a patent-holder within 10 years. Do I have to get a degree from Top Universities like MIT, CalTech and others in addition to self-motivation? What do you think?


The only thing you need is two sets of brains and inspiration + the will to work work work...


marlon :approve:
 
And then you got to pay thousands of $ and wait years for it to be evaluated. And after all that, you'll need loads of lawyer $ if you got to defend it.
 
Patents aren't that special. There are so many variation of processes that it's trivial to think of something that can be patented. The real challenge is to come up with something that companies find cheaper to license from you, instead of designing around the patent and/or threatening you with a cross licensing scheme. Patents themselves cost around $4,000 w/o a patent lawyer. With a patent lawyer it can run up to $12,000.
 
I suspect one can involve himself in international issues as well.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top