Can somebody rephrase this putnam problem for me?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on Problem 2 from the 2007 Putnam Competition, specifically addressing the need to rephrase the problem for clarity. The user identifies a monovariant related to the sum of differences between adjacent rooms, which is bounded and monotonically increasing. The key equation involves the sum ∑ 1/(n_i + 1), where n_i represents the number of people in room i. The user concludes that the sum increases when transitioning between rooms with varying populations, establishing a clear mathematical relationship.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of combinatorial mathematics
  • Familiarity with the Putnam Competition format
  • Knowledge of monotonic functions
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of fractions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of monotonic sequences in combinatorial contexts
  • Explore the implications of the sum ∑ 1/(n_i + 1) in various mathematical problems
  • Review strategies for solving problems in the Putnam Competition
  • Investigate the concept of monovariants in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, competitive problem solvers, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of combinatorial reasoning and Putnam-style problems.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


http://math.stanford.edu/~vakil/putnam07/07putnam5.pdf

I am working on Problem 2.

Can someone rephrase that question for me? I do not see why you would be dividing anything in this problem.

The monovariant I found in Sample 3 was the sum of the difference between people in adjacent rooms. This number is bounded from above and monotonically increasing. The upper bound is the total number of people times the maximum number of rooms connected to anyone room.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Problem 2 says:
Solve sample 3 in a manner that makes use of the sum
\sum 1/(n_i + 1).​
 
Then I really have no idea. This must be completely different than the way I explained in the first post. I don't know what the n_i are and I still do not see where division would come in.

But wait. Let n_i be the number of people in room i. The reason you need to add 1 in the denominator is because a room might have 0 people. Now, when someone goes from room i_1 to room i_2, that sum changes by

1/(n_{i_1}}) - 1/(n_{i_1} +1)+ 1/(n_{i_2} +2) - 1/(n_{i_2}+1})

and it is easy to show that this sum is positive when n_j is greater than or equal to n_i

So that sum is monotonically increasing.

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
24K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K