Can someone be too old or too late for physics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether individuals can be too old or too late to pursue a career in physics, particularly from the perspective of a 20-year-old first-year physics student who transitioned from medical school. The student expresses concerns about starting later than peers and doubts about making significant contributions to the field. Participants emphasize that many successful physicists achieved breakthroughs later in life, countering the notion that early starters dominate the field. They argue that scientific progress is a collective effort built on the foundational work of many, not just a few renowned figures. Ultimately, the consensus is that it is never too late to pursue a passion for physics or make meaningful contributions.
pablotano
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Can someone be "too old" or "too late" for physics?

I am a first year physics student, but I am 20 years old (pretty old for my country, average starting age is 18), because I started after leaving med school, which I find extremely jailed in "memorization walls", with no place for analytical problem solving, something that I have loved all my life. I started to love physics because I was introduced to neuroscience, which lead me to information theory, probability analisis, mathematics and physics.
I decided to study physics not only because I practically become obsessed with any problem I encourage, but also because I find physics to be the only "real" foundation of the understanting of nature, thanks to its mathematical basis.
Well, now the problem is that I constantly see that most physicists that discover great things all started very very young, which is not my case. So, besides I am really good at math (the first of my class), I am periodically dissapointed about the fact that I am maybe too old to make a difference, and this sometimes brings me back to think if I made the right decision when I left med school.

The thread here is about sharing information about cases of physicists that did great discoveries without being extremely precocious or "geniuses" since they were kids. Also your opinion about this kind of situation would be of real help.

What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bigQ said:
It is never too late to do anything. Even I've started learning physics too late. Try some online learning resources. And yeah try this http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~hooft101/theorist.html

Well, this was one of the places where I read that "if you want to earn a Nobel Prize blah blah blah, you should start studying before you are supposed to", besides, I Am already in university studying physics. Anyway, thank you very much for the resource!
 
Why is a Nobel Prize everyone's benchmark for useful work? I don't understand that mentality at all. Nobel Laureates represent the very apex of scientific research/innovation (plus a bit of politics and such). That's like saying that all NBA players in the 1990's should have retired because Michael Jordan was the best. Science is not done by a handful of brilliant people who revolutionize the world in an instant of epiphany, despite what the lay press, historical texts etc show. It is a slow and arduous process where the major breakthroughs, attributed to a single person or small group, are built on a solid foundation of work done by people who the majority of the world will never hear of.

Every heard of Charles Darwin? How about Alfred Russel Wallace, Charles Lyell, James Hutton or Thomas Malthus?
 
Yanick said:
Why is a Nobel Prize everyone's benchmark for useful work? I don't understand that mentality at all. Nobel Laureates represent the very apex of scientific research/innovation (plus a bit of politics and such). That's like saying that all NBA players in the 1990's should have retired because Michael Jordan was the best. Science is not done by a handful of brilliant people who revolutionize the world in an instant of epiphany, despite what the lay press, historical texts etc show. It is a slow and arduous process where the major breakthroughs, attributed to a single person or small group, are built on a solid foundation of work done by people who the majority of the world will never hear of.

Every heard of Charles Darwin? How about Alfred Russel Wallace, Charles Lyell, James Hutton or Thomas Malthus?

I think just like you, in an enteview, Feynman said that he did not want any kind of honours, especially the Nobel Prze, he just loved to solve problems and discover answers, and if any, he just like the kind of recognition that arises when you see other scientists working with your work as their base.
 
We have identical threads on this topic once a week.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
99
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top