Can someone decipher this for me?

  • Thread starter Thread starter seang
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the synthesis of esters, specifically the methyl ester and 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl ester of 10-undecylenic acid. The synthesis involves refluxing 10-undecylenic acid with methanol or 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol in the presence of sulfuric acid, followed by a workup process that includes dissolving the crude product in ether, washing with sodium bicarbonate, water, and saturated NaCl solution, and drying over magnesium sulfate. The identity of the products was confirmed through proton NMR analysis. A participant expressed confusion about the term "workup," seeking clarification on its meaning within the context of the procedure. Another contributor clarified that "workup" refers to the steps taken after the reaction to isolate the desired product, confirming that the described washing and drying steps constitute the workup process.
seang
Messages
184
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am an electrical engineer, but I have to complete the following procedure:


Synthesis of Esters. (a)

Methyl Ester.
The methyl ester of 10-
undecylenic acid was prepared similarly to the method used by Sieval.
The 10-undecylenic acid was dissolved in methanol and allowed to
reflux for 3 h with a small amount of sulfuric acid. Excess methanol
was removed by vacuum. The crude product was dissolved in ether,
washed with a saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, water, then a
saturated NaCl solution, and dried over magnesium sulfate. The identity
of the vacuum distilled product was confirmed using proton NMR.
1H NMR: ä 5.73-5.89 (m, 1H), 4.89-5.04 (m, 2H), 3.67 (s, 3H),
2.25-2.35 (t, 2H), 1.99-2.09 (m, 2H), 1.54-1.69 (m, 2H), 1.23-
1.44 (m, 10H).

(b) 2,2,2-Trifluoroethyl Ester. The fluorinated ethyl ester of 10-
undecylenic acid was prepared similarly to the methyl ester. To 30 g
of 10-undecylenic acid was added 22 g of 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol
dissolved in 40 mL of toluene. This mixture was allowed to reflux
with a small amount of sulfuric acid for 3 h using a Dean-Stark
apparatus. Workup similar to the methyl ester produced a crude product
that was further purified by vacuum distillation. Proton, COSY, and
fluorine NMR confirmed the identity of the product.
1H NMR: ä 5.70-5.90 (m, 1H), 4.86-5.06 (m, 2H), 4.38-4.51
(q, 2H), 2.35-2.45 (t, 2H), 1.98-2.10 (m, 2H), 1.55-1.75 (m, 2H),
1.20-1.50 (m, 10H). Fluorine NMR: single triplet.That word there, WORKUP, is kinda ambiguous to me as an EE. Not sure what part of procedure a.) they are referring to. My best guess is "...washed with a saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, water, then a saturated NaCl solution, and dried over magnesium sulfate."

Any ideas?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
seang said:
Hi,

I am an electrical engineer, but I have to complete the following procedure:


Synthesis of Esters. (a)

Methyl Ester.
The methyl ester of 10-
undecylenic acid was prepared similarly to the method used by Sieval.
The 10-undecylenic acid was dissolved in methanol and allowed to
reflux for 3 h with a small amount of sulfuric acid. Excess methanol
was removed by vacuum. The crude product was dissolved in ether,
washed with a saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, water, then a
saturated NaCl solution, and dried over magnesium sulfate. The identity
of the vacuum distilled product was confirmed using proton NMR.
1H NMR: ä 5.73-5.89 (m, 1H), 4.89-5.04 (m, 2H), 3.67 (s, 3H),
2.25-2.35 (t, 2H), 1.99-2.09 (m, 2H), 1.54-1.69 (m, 2H), 1.23-
1.44 (m, 10H).

(b) 2,2,2-Trifluoroethyl Ester. The fluorinated ethyl ester of 10-
undecylenic acid was prepared similarly to the methyl ester. To 30 g
of 10-undecylenic acid was added 22 g of 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol
dissolved in 40 mL of toluene. This mixture was allowed to reflux
with a small amount of sulfuric acid for 3 h using a Dean-Stark
apparatus. Workup similar to the methyl ester produced a crude product
that was further purified by vacuum distillation. Proton, COSY, and
fluorine NMR confirmed the identity of the product.
1H NMR: ä 5.70-5.90 (m, 1H), 4.86-5.06 (m, 2H), 4.38-4.51
(q, 2H), 2.35-2.45 (t, 2H), 1.98-2.10 (m, 2H), 1.55-1.75 (m, 2H),
1.20-1.50 (m, 10H). Fluorine NMR: single triplet.


That word there, WORKUP, is kinda ambiguous to me as an EE. Not sure what part of procedure a.) they are referring to. My best guess is "...washed with a saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, water, then a saturated NaCl solution, and dried over magnesium sulfate."

Any ideas?

Looks like a standard transesterification. Workup is everything after the reaction is completed to isolate the desired product. Therefore, according to what you have, the workup is... "The crude product was dissolved in ether (the trifluoroester may or may not be soluble in ether), washed with a saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, water, then a saturated NaCl solution, and dried over magnesium sulfate. The identity of the vacuum distilled product was confirmed using proton NMR."
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your help!
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top