Can someone help me with calculating cartesian coordinates for a moving object?

Ralgar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi. I was just wondering if anyone could help me with a formula to solve the following problem.

I have two locations (L1 and L2), which I know the cartesian coordinates of, situated in a three dimensional space. I also have a distance (D) which I also know the value of. D is not the distance between L1 and L2. If an object moves from it's starting location at L1 in a straight line towards L2, how do I calculate the cartesian coordinates of the object after it has traveled a distance of D units.

I'd certainly appreciate any assistance in this.

Cheers.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let L1= (x1,y1,z1) and
L2= (x2,y2,z2).

Let d= distance from L2 to L1= [sqrt]((x2-x1)2+(y2-y1)2+(z2-z1)2).

The any point on the line through L2 and L1 has coordinates
x= x1+ (x2-x1)(t/d)
y= y1+ (y2-y1(t/d)
z= z1+ (z2-z1)(t/d)

(notice that when t= 0, this is x= x1 and when t= d, this is x= x2, etc.)

In particular, taking t= D will give the coordinates of the point at distance D from L1 in the direction of L2.
 
Thank you.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top