Can Space Aircraft Reach Speed of Light in Vacuum?

firin81
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
As we known, the force applied to the plane that fly in the atmosphere is to keep plane moving forward. The force given is to against the pressure of the air. If a space aircraft flies in the vacuum, the force given to it will accelerate aircraft because there is no friction caused by air pressure. Hence, the speed of aircraft will keep increasing. if we keep to give force to the aircraft, can the aircraft reach the speed of light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
firin81 said:
As we known, the force applied to the plane that fly in the atmosphere is to keep plane moving forward. The force given is to against the pressure of the air. If a space aircraft flies in the vacuum, the force given to it will accelerate aircraft because there is no friction caused by air pressure. Hence, the speed of aircraft will keep increasing. if we keep to give force to the aircraft, can the aircraft reach the speed of light?
If you put an aircraft in a vacuum it would not be able to accelerate at all!
 
No, the inertia of an objec increases with its velocity.
 
Hi Firin welcome to Physicsforums. :smile:

As measured from Earth, you could almost reach the speed of light with a spacecraft .
An infinite amount of energy would be needed to get it to reach exactly the speed of light.
 
Thanks for all your comment.
 
PeroK said:
If you put an aircraft in a vacuum it would not be able to accelerate at all!
Come on, this is not the point PeroK. :smile:
 
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
Back
Top