Can speed of light be faster with this?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the theoretical possibility of a long steel rod, anchored at one end, being moved in space to exceed the speed of light. Participants argue that while the lack of resistance in space might suggest faster movement, the principles of inertia and the speed of sound in materials prevent any object with mass from surpassing light speed. The concept of pushing or pulling the rod is challenged by the realities of molecular interactions and the limits imposed by relativity. Additionally, the feasibility of constructing such a rod is deemed impossible due to material limitations. Ultimately, the consensus is that no mechanism can enable an object with mass to accelerate to or exceed the speed of light.
Archangel
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can this be doable in theory? Because who in the right mind would build this :)

Let us imagine if we could build a steel rod, that has mass of 1 Kg, that has length about 300000 km. Yeah I know, impossible, but how about some material that can weight 1Kg or even 10Kg. But in space even 1000 tons of material is like a feather.

Now let's say that we anchor one side to earth, asteroid or whatever.
If rod is r in circle, then quarter of circle would be 471000 km.
Now few cm from anchor we push or pull rod for a 1/4 circle, because there is no resistance in space/universe, or it is minor, it could be pushed or pulled by a second or fraction of a second. So the far end would cross 471000 km by a second or less.
 
Science news on Phys.org
What do you think happens on a molecular level when you push something?
 
Archangel said:
But in space even 1000 tons of material is like a feather.

The mass of an object doesn't change by moving it to space, it's weight will change but not it's mass.

Archangel said:
Now let's say that we anchor one side to earth, asteroid or whatever.
If rod is r in circle, then quarter of circle would be 471000 km.
Now few cm from anchor we push or pull rod for a 1/4 circle, because there is no resistance in space/universe, or it is minor, it could be pushed or pulled by a second or fraction of a second. So the far end would cross 471000 km by a second or less.

Are you saying that you want to turn this rod in a circle with one end being the center of the circle and the other end being the edge of the circle? I believe that is what you are saying, but it's a little difficult to tell. Anyway, you say there would be little to no resistance to pushing or pulling on this rod. This simply is not true. If you are rotating the rod it has a moment of inertia, which is the resistance to change in rotation. If you are simply moving the rod (not rotating) it has inertia (it's mass) which is a resistance to change in momentum. You will not be able to move this rod faster than the speed of light.
 
Last edited:
Archangel said:
Can this be doable in theory? Because who in the right mind would build this :)

Let us imagine if we could build a steel rod, that has mass of 1 Kg, that has length about 300000 km. Yeah I know, impossible, but how about some material that can weight 1Kg or even 10Kg. But in space even 1000 tons of material is like a feather.

Now let's say that we anchor one side to earth, asteroid or whatever.
If rod is r in circle, then quarter of circle would be 471000 km.
Now few cm from anchor we push or pull rod for a 1/4 circle, because there is no resistance in space/universe, or it is minor, it could be pushed or pulled by a second or fraction of a second. So the far end would cross 471000 km by a second or less.

This is completely impossible for the following reasons;

1. There is no material in existence both that light and strong.
2. No matter what the mechanism nothing with a rest mass can accelarate to c. There is no tricking relativity here!
 
Archangel said:
Let us imagine if we could build a steel rod, that has mass of 1 Kg, that has length about 300000 km. Yeah I know, impossible, but how about some material that can weight 1Kg or even 10Kg. But in space even 1000 tons of material is like a feather.

I'm afraid you're mixing up http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight" . 1000 tons in space would be just as hard to move as 1000 tons on Earth (well it would be a little easier thanks to the lack of friction).

Now let's say that we anchor one side to earth, asteroid or whatever.
If rod is r in circle, then quarter of circle would be 471000 km.
Now few cm from anchor we push or pull rod for a 1/4 circle, because there is no resistance in space/universe, or it is minor, it could be pushed or pulled by a second or fraction of a second. So the far end would cross 471000 km by a second or less.

Compressive forces don't travel instantly through materials unfortunately, they travel at the speed of sound. When you push an object the first atoms bang into the next, which bang into the next etc. Nothing faster than light here :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top