Can speed of light be faster with this?

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of building a steel rod with a mass of 1 Kg and a length of 300000 km, or using a lighter material with a weight of 1 or 10 Kg. However, the idea is deemed impossible due to the lack of any known material that is both light and strong enough. The conversation also touches on the concept of weight and mass in space, and the limitations of moving objects at the speed of light.
  • #1
Archangel
1
0
Can this be doable in theory? Because who in the right mind would build this :)

Let us imagine if we could build a steel rod, that has mass of 1 Kg, that has length about 300000 km. Yeah I know, impossible, but how about some material that can weight 1Kg or even 10Kg. But in space even 1000 tons of material is like a feather.

Now let's say that we anchor one side to earth, asteroid or whatever.
If rod is r in circle, then quarter of circle would be 471000 km.
Now few cm from anchor we push or pull rod for a 1/4 circle, because there is no resistance in space/universe, or it is minor, it could be pushed or pulled by a second or fraction of a second. So the far end would cross 471000 km by a second or less.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
What do you think happens on a molecular level when you push something?
 
  • #3
Archangel said:
But in space even 1000 tons of material is like a feather.

The mass of an object doesn't change by moving it to space, it's weight will change but not it's mass.

Archangel said:
Now let's say that we anchor one side to earth, asteroid or whatever.
If rod is r in circle, then quarter of circle would be 471000 km.
Now few cm from anchor we push or pull rod for a 1/4 circle, because there is no resistance in space/universe, or it is minor, it could be pushed or pulled by a second or fraction of a second. So the far end would cross 471000 km by a second or less.

Are you saying that you want to turn this rod in a circle with one end being the center of the circle and the other end being the edge of the circle? I believe that is what you are saying, but it's a little difficult to tell. Anyway, you say there would be little to no resistance to pushing or pulling on this rod. This simply is not true. If you are rotating the rod it has a moment of inertia, which is the resistance to change in rotation. If you are simply moving the rod (not rotating) it has inertia (it's mass) which is a resistance to change in momentum. You will not be able to move this rod faster than the speed of light.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Archangel said:
Can this be doable in theory? Because who in the right mind would build this :)

Let us imagine if we could build a steel rod, that has mass of 1 Kg, that has length about 300000 km. Yeah I know, impossible, but how about some material that can weight 1Kg or even 10Kg. But in space even 1000 tons of material is like a feather.

Now let's say that we anchor one side to earth, asteroid or whatever.
If rod is r in circle, then quarter of circle would be 471000 km.
Now few cm from anchor we push or pull rod for a 1/4 circle, because there is no resistance in space/universe, or it is minor, it could be pushed or pulled by a second or fraction of a second. So the far end would cross 471000 km by a second or less.

This is completely impossible for the following reasons;

1. There is no material in existence both that light and strong.
2. No matter what the mechanism nothing with a rest mass can accelarate to c. There is no tricking relativity here!
 
  • #5
Archangel said:
Let us imagine if we could build a steel rod, that has mass of 1 Kg, that has length about 300000 km. Yeah I know, impossible, but how about some material that can weight 1Kg or even 10Kg. But in space even 1000 tons of material is like a feather.

I'm afraid you're mixing up http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight" . 1000 tons in space would be just as hard to move as 1000 tons on Earth (well it would be a little easier thanks to the lack of friction).

Now let's say that we anchor one side to earth, asteroid or whatever.
If rod is r in circle, then quarter of circle would be 471000 km.
Now few cm from anchor we push or pull rod for a 1/4 circle, because there is no resistance in space/universe, or it is minor, it could be pushed or pulled by a second or fraction of a second. So the far end would cross 471000 km by a second or less.

Compressive forces don't travel instantly through materials unfortunately, they travel at the speed of sound. When you push an object the first atoms bang into the next, which bang into the next etc. Nothing faster than light here :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. Can the speed of light be faster than its current value?

No, according to the theory of relativity, the speed of light in a vacuum is constant and cannot be exceeded.

2. Is there any evidence that the speed of light can be faster?

No, extensive experiments and observations have consistently shown that the speed of light is constant and cannot be exceeded.

3. Are there any theories or hypotheses that suggest the speed of light can be faster?

There have been some theories proposed, such as the tachyon theory, which suggest the existence of particles that can travel faster than the speed of light. However, these theories have not been supported by empirical evidence and remain speculative.

4. Could advancements in technology or physics allow us to eventually exceed the speed of light?

This is highly unlikely. The theory of relativity, which has been extensively tested and confirmed, suggests that the speed of light is the ultimate speed limit in the universe.

5. What are the implications if the speed of light were to be faster?

If the speed of light were to be faster, it would fundamentally change our understanding of the universe and the laws of physics. It would also have significant implications for space travel and communication, as well as potentially challenging the theory of relativity.

Similar threads

  • Optics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
51
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
779
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
28
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top