Can step functions have inverse relationships?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJKing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function General
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of inverse relationships in functions, particularly focusing on step functions and their potential inverses. The original poster questions whether a function s(t) implies the existence of an inverse function t(s) and explores examples of functions that may not have inverses.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions under which functions have inverses, citing examples like trigonometric functions and the function y = f(x) = x². They question the invertibility of the integral of e^{u^2} and consider the implications of step functions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring various interpretations of function invertibility, with participants providing examples and questioning the assumptions behind the existence of inverse functions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of one-to-one functions and the implications for inverses.

Contextual Notes

Participants are examining specific functions and their properties, including the integral of e^{u^2} and step functions, while considering the constraints of function definitions and the concept of one-to-one mappings.

AJKing
Messages
104
Reaction score
2
If a function s(t) exists, does a function t(s) always exist?

Are there functions with no inverse relationships?

Suppose

s = \int^t_a e^{u^2} du

Can there be a t(s)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the trig functions for sin and cos over 0 to 2pi. They are clearly functions if inverted will map to two angles for a given sin or cos value. So the inverse is not a function.

For the sin if you restrict it 0 to pi/2 then its invertible and similarly for cos if you restrict it to 0 to pi.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_function

Try drawing a graph of e^u^2 and estimate the area under the curve and see if its invertible.
 
Last edited:
AJKing said:
If a function s(t) exists, does a function t(s) always exist?
Let's revise your notation a bit to make things more understandable.
Suppose y = s(t) is a function. "s" is just the name of the function that maps values of t to values of y. Many functions do not have inverses that are themselves functions. A very simple example is y = f(x) = x2. Because f is not one-to-one, f does not have an inverse.
AJKing said:
Are there functions with no inverse relationships?

Suppose

s = \int^t_a e^{u^2} du

Can there be a t(s)?
 
Mark44 said:
A very simple example is y = f(x) = x2. Because f is not one-to-one, f does not have an inverse.

Hmm, what about a solution involving step functions?

x = u0 y1/2-(1-u0)y1/2

Wolfram visual.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K