Can sum1 help me wit this question?

  • Thread starter Thread starter b_ball_gurl87
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, the concept of work in physics is examined through the scenario of a swimmer in a river. When the swimmer is stationary relative to the shore, no work is done on him despite the effort exerted, as there is no displacement. Conversely, if the swimmer floats downstream, work is done on him due to the movement with the water flow. The conversation highlights common misconceptions about work, emphasizing that physical exertion does not equate to work unless there is displacement. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the concept of work in physics.
b_ball_gurl87
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hey can sum1 help me with this question?

a swimmer is trying to swim upstream in a river with a constant flow of water, but remains stationary relative to shore.

a. is any work being done on the swimmer? explain.

b. if the swimmer stops swimming and floats with the water flow, is any work done on the swimmer? Explain.

please get back to me asap. I am studyn for my test

email be back at b_ball_gurl87@hotmail.com
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a very good way to test any work being done on the swimmer is simply asking him, " are you tried ?" if he did, he must have DONE some WORK...
 
Start with the definition of work.

(Constant force case)
The work done on an object as it travels from one point to another is the force times displacement.

Suppose you're standing on the shore. What is the displacement of the swimmer? So what is the work done on the swimmer?

vincentchan said:
a very good way to test any work being done on the swimmer is simply asking him, " are you tried ?" if he did, he must have DONE some WORK...

No. This is a common misconception about the concept of work. Do not relate work with physical labour.
Suppose you would hold a heavy book in one hand with outstreched arm. You'd get pretty tired after a while, but since the displacement of the book is zero, NO work is done on the book.
 
Galileo said:
No. This is a common misconception about the concept of work. Do not relate work with physical labour.
Suppose you would hold a heavy book in one hand with outstreched arm. You'd get pretty tired after a while, but since the displacement of the book is zero, NO work is done on the book.

Very good. Just like the situation when a person pushes against an immovable wall.

But can you figure out why a person gets tired if no "work" is actually being done ? (hint : consider micro-scale effects)
 
The original question also did NOT ask if the person had done work. It asked if work was done ON him.

As long as he is stationary, there is no work done on him. If he floats downstream, then work is done on him.
 
vincentchan said:
a very good way to test any work being done on the swimmer is simply asking him, " are you tried ?" if he did, he must have DONE some WORK...


lol :biggrin:
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Frames of Reference and Relative Velocity
Replies
3
Views
6K
Calculating Relative Velocity for a Swimmer Training in a River
Replies
7
Views
2K
Optimizing River Crossing Velocity Vectors
Replies
5
Views
7K
Vector Question: Swimmer Across River Diagram Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
Swimming across a river question
Replies
1
Views
6K
Crossing a River: Calculating Angle between Swimmer & Bank
Replies
12
Views
8K
Relative Motion (Swimmer Crossing River Question)
Replies
1
Views
12K
Relative Velocity of two swimmers
Replies
4
Views
7K
How Can a Swimmer Land Directly Across a River with a Current?
Replies
1
Views
3K
About Taylor & Wheeler 3-1 practice problem
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top