Can Supercooling Have Practical Uses Beyond Hiking Heating Packs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Siracuse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Applications
AI Thread Summary
Supercooling has potential applications beyond hiking heating packs, including preventing supercooled water droplets from damaging airplane wings. This phenomenon could also lead to innovative material creation and new industrial processes, although these ideas remain speculative. The physics of supercooling is not well understood, prompting curiosity about its mechanisms and uses. Currently, supercooling is effectively utilized in heating packs, where a salt solution remains liquid until triggered to freeze, releasing heat. Overall, exploring supercooling could yield significant advancements in various fields.
Siracuse
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
(No, not homework)

This struck me by curiosity. What applications could supercooling possibly have? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quite a few actually.

The first thing that comes to mind is how you actually can avoid machines being supercooled. In clouds you got supercooled droplets of water and other materials, which roughs up the wings on aeroplanes. This is not good for the plane to maintain design specs.

Another would be new ways of making materials and maybe new processes in industry, although this is very speculative. :)

This is an area in physics that is very little understood to my knowledge. But please, it would be fun to hear how it works and what you use it for.
 
It is used in heating packs for hikers, you have a solution of some salt which is heated to melt it - it stays liquid as it cools until something triggers the freezing, ussually alittle 'clicker' that creates a shock. When it freezes it gives out heat. You recharge it by heating it to melt the substance.

I don't know but I imagine it could be used to make alloys of metals that would otherwise separate while being slowly cooled.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top