Can Superparticles with Charge be Detected at the LHC?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnbaldry
  • Start date Start date
johnbaldry
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The LHC may help discover the existence of neutralinos, which are WIMPs and hard to detect.

If this is due their charge being 0 and therefore non-reactive to EM detection, why can't we detect another superparticle,one that does have a charge, and therefore reacts with light so that we could detect it?
eg the selectron or the super particle of a proton?

thanks

Arthur
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I usually leave the replies to people who know what they are talking about. Unfortunately none of them have chimed in.

It is usually thought that supersymmetry is a badly broken symmetry. Which is a fancy way of saying superparticles are heavy, maybe a TeV, which is why they haven't been seen.

It is often postulated that supersymmetry is conserved. (They call it R-gauge or some fancy term like that.) So the lightest supersymetric particle (LSP) is stable and should be buzzing around the universe if it exists. The LSP is electrically neutral and colorless from cosmology constraints so the neutralino is an excellent candidate for it.
 
the lightest, stable superparticle will not interact with ordinary matter (including the detector); therefore the signature is missing energy and momentum
 
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Many of us have heard of "twistors", arguably Roger Penrose's biggest contribution to theoretical physics. Twistor space is a space which maps nonlocally onto physical space-time; in particular, lightlike structures in space-time, like null lines and light cones, become much more "local" in twistor space. For various reasons, Penrose thought that twistor space was possibly a more fundamental arena for theoretical physics than space-time, and for many years he and a hardy band of mostly...
Back
Top