Can Testosterone Use in Sports Lead to Disqualification?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quantum123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sports
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the controversy surrounding the disqualification of an athlete for testosterone use, raising questions about the fairness of doping regulations. It highlights the body's natural production of testosterone and contrasts it with other substances like EPO, which can be differentiated in testing. The conversation critiques the inconsistencies in sports regulations, noting that while painkillers enhance performance, they remain legal. The dominance of Norwegian athletes in endurance sports is attributed to their use of high-altitude training, which boosts oxygen levels and stamina. The dialogue suggests that the current rules are based on flawed notions of what constitutes "natural" enhancement and calls for a reevaluation of these regulations in light of their contradictions and the health implications for athletes.
quantum123
Messages
306
Reaction score
1
Recently someone has been stripped off the medals she has won over sports because she has consumed testosterone.
But how can someone be accused of consuming testosterone if this chemical can be produced by the body itself?
Will anyone be accused of consuming endorphins?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Usually, blood tests are taken throughout an athlete's career. If a blood test differs significantly from a previous one, it's an indication that something is amiss. Women don't just spontaneously start secreting large amounts of testosterone.

- Warren
 
Naughty naughty, popular athelete. :biggrin:
 
I don't know the details about the testosterone testing method, but it can be possible to distinguish endogenous proteins from pharmaceutical proteins, as is done with EPO (erythropoietin) by differences in residue patterns (that doping test is quite controversial though).
 
The rules concerning regulatives on drugs are hopelessly contradictory.
For example, pain-killers markedly increase the athlete's ability to perform, but is wholly legal for some reason.

Norwegians have hollered to be allowed to exercise in costly "high-altitude" houses, which dramatically increases the level of oxygen-carrying hemoglobin, and thereby, there stamina with respect to other athletes.
This is the real reason why Norwegians are so dominant in endurance sports like cross country skiing.


Just throw all the rules into the trash bin, along with the fallacious dictum "Mens sana in corpore sanem"

There's nothing healthy about top athlete competitions, so one should do the world a favour by destroying that myth once and for all.

Each rule in force is there due to some deluded notion as to what is a "natural" augmentation, and what is not.
 
Last edited:
arildno said:
Norwegians have hollered to be allowed to exercise in costly "high-altitude" houses, which dramatically increases the level of oxygen-carrying hemoglobin, and thereby, there stamina with respect to other athletes.
This is the real reason why Norwegians are so dominant in endurance sports like cross country skiing.

Yes, this way you naturally produce EPO and it's legal. I guess the limit is that your body naturally limits what it can take, when you inject EPO you run the risk of overdosing and thus dying (which has happened quite a lot in the '90s, where atheletes died in their sleep due to EPO side-effects). And you can't really exclude atheletes that live above a certain altitude.
 
Last edited:
Actually, the "high-altitude" house is right here in Oslo, in the lowlands.
If they want to live in the highlands, then they can go and live in the highlands, like Finse.
 

Similar threads

Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
6K
Replies
38
Views
1K
Back
Top