Can the Archimedean Property Prove 1/n < x for All Positive Reals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Samuelb88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complete Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for all positive real numbers x, there exists a natural number n such that 1/n < x, utilizing the Archimedean property. The proof begins by manipulating the inequality 1 < nx and substituting x with a rational number a/b. However, a more concise proof is suggested that avoids introducing additional variables a and b, instead leveraging the fact that 1/x is also a positive real number. This approach simplifies the proof while maintaining rigor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Archimedean property in real analysis
  • Familiarity with inequalities and their manipulation
  • Basic knowledge of rational numbers and their properties
  • Concept of natural numbers and their relationship to real numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Archimedean property in detail, focusing on its applications in real analysis
  • Learn about proofs involving inequalities and their simplifications
  • Explore the properties of rational and irrational numbers
  • Investigate alternative proofs for similar mathematical statements
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in real analysis or proof techniques involving the Archimedean property.

Samuelb88
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use the Archimedean property: For all x in the positive reals there exists an n in the naturals such that n > x.

to prove: For all x in the positive reals there exists an n in the naturals such that 1/n < x.

The Attempt at a Solution



Proof: Multiplying through the inequality by n (I am not including 0 in the set of all natural numbers) yields 1 < nx. Let x = a/b, where a,b are in the positive reals. Substituting into the inequality the subsequent value of x yields 1 < (an)/b. Dividing through the inequality by a/b yields b/a < n, where b/a is in the positive reals. By the Archimedean property, we may always find an n in the naturals such that n > b/a. This proves the first consequence of the Archimedean property. Q.E.D. ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Samuelb8! :smile:

Yes, it's correct, but you won't get many marks for it, since it's too roundabout.

You talk about two new numbers, a and b (and you give no way of defining them), but all you use them for is defining b/a …

can you find a shorter version of your proof that doesn't need a or b? :wink:
 
Hint: 1/x is a positive real too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K